1. College students should be encouraged to pursue subjects that interest them rather than the courses that seem most likely to lead to jobs.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
The author claims that students should encourage to follow fields in which they are interested instead of fields which most probably leads to an affair. This is the assertion with which I generally do concur, among the countless rearing reasons which give adherence to my perspective, I will delve into the most conspicuous ones in the following paragraphs to support my standpoint.
The first striking reason is the warranted occupation in the future by any type of education; indeed, no matter what is study area of a student, the syllabus of school presents the list of courses which are fundaments for varied types of occupation. Therefore, focusing on the specified field of study does not prevent the possibility of getting a job in the future. Although, there are some careers which are more popular in the society and according to this fame they categorized as the lucrative jobs which pay off well; it should be considered as the nonexistence of the other types of affairs. Actually, any society regardless of its financial and social state requires all and various types of the job; this can be considered that as long as a doctor is a requirement of the society, the carpenter is a need of that society too. In addition, while no doctor can do the timber tasks, allocation of the whole entire working force in the field of medicine makes that society to become weaken and depended on the other society to fulfilled their requirement in the field of a carpenter. Thus, a comprehensive demand for various jobs by the society cases the warranted occupation in all study areas presented in the school.
The second crux reason which should be highlighted is the effect of interest in the professionality on the topic. In fact, as a person is eager about the topic, he concentrates on the topic more than others; this fact is also verified by the current study conducted by the Department of Phycology in Tehran University. Based on this currently released research, the level of concentration by an individual over the intreated topic is sixty-five percent higher than a situation which that individual is not interested in it. According to this fact about the concentration because of interest, mankind seeks and catches the latest data about the field and updated his understanding. In this scenario, by consideration of his occupation on that eager field, he would be a well-informed person on that specific field; consequently, his function will be flawless which is profitable for both society and person.
Finally, the impact of the interest over the success in task and level of persistence in the case of facing the failures should be underestimated. Indeed, while a person is eager about a topic, in a situation which he faces the fail, he rarely gives up. A bright example of this issue the attempt of Wright Brother over the invention of the glider, this feat did not achieved overnight and they put their effort on this topic for more than the three years until achieved that fabulous result. Actually, this attempt is the fundament of all types of activity and reached success; besides, none of the successes are reached in the first try. Therefore, if a person is wishing to achieve success, he should try over and over until reaches his desired situation. This steadiness over the repetition of progress and restarting is higher when a person is interested in that field. Therefore, by this encouragement, the school flourished successful individuals for the future.
To wrap it up, all the aforementioned reasons explicitly illustrate the reasonability of the adduced claim.
- tpo3 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Parents should allow children to make their own choices rather than determine their future for them. 70
- Young people should be encouraged to pursue long-term, realistic goals rather than seek immediate fame and recognition.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for t 58
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In the twenty years, there will be fewer cars in use there are today 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?To improve the quality of education, universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 367, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'did' requires the base form of the verb: 'achieve'
Suggestion: achieve
...ention of the glider, this feat did not achieved overnight and they put their effort on ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 663, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...n the first try. Therefore, if a person is wishing to achieve success, he should try over ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 109, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the reasonability of the adduced claim.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, besides, consequently, finally, first, if, second, so, therefore, thus, well, while, in addition, in fact, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.5258426966 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 21.0 11.3162921348 186% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 33.0505617978 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 96.0 58.6224719101 164% => OK
Nominalization: 25.0 12.9106741573 194% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3002.0 2235.4752809 134% => OK
No of words: 601.0 442.535393258 136% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99500831947 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.95129289623 4.55969084622 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9115407526 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 282.0 215.323595506 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.46921797005 0.4932671777 95% => OK
syllable_count: 949.5 704.065955056 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 6.24550561798 208% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 10.0 4.99550561798 200% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 23.0359550562 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.8373393487 60.3974514979 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.952380952 118.986275619 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.619047619 23.4991977007 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.28571428571 5.21951772744 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144107202182 0.243740707755 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0494859120594 0.0831039109588 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.058193478204 0.0758088955206 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0865859381283 0.150359130593 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.070358107553 0.0667264976115 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 14.1392134831 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 48.8420337079 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.38706741573 109% => OK
difficult_words: 158.0 100.480337079 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.8971910112 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 11.2143820225 118% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.