65. *Every individual in a society has a responsibility to obey just laws and to disobey and resist unjust laws. 事实
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
The speaker asserts that everyone has the responsibility to obey just laws and disobey unjust laws. I agree with this argument and I would even go further to say that the peaceful resistance against unjust laws is not just a responsibility but also a necessity to improve the well-being of our society. The unjust judicial laws, scientific laws and design principles all request individual’s feedback.
People who do not agree with this argument may contend that the disobedience and resistance against unjust laws would bring harmful effects on our society in consideration of the recent Guillets Jaunes manifestation that happened in France. The middle and low-income people violently manifested their discontent and this movement finally escalated into social tumult. Guillets Jaunes event intended to violate the French President Emmanuel Macron’s tax reform on fuel tax. Hundreds of thousands of people, who do not accept the fuel tax reform, assembled in main streets in over ten major cities. Their assemblies seriously affected the social operation and produced social disorders in a mass scale. Transportation, public services, commercial activities were totally shut down. Guillets Jaunes movement finally turned into lootings, arsons and apparent assaults. It resulted in a financially weakened country and damaged properties of normal people. This violent manifestation discovered the negative aspect and the unwanted results brought by the public’s resistance against unjust laws.
I concede that the violent methods of manifestation are not accepted, even though the social cause is worthy. However, if the public, the great number of people can present their views towards unjust laws peacefully, they should be allowed even encouraged. This is because social development depends on the participation into public affairs, the contribution of ideas of individuals. The resistance of individuals helps the authorities to adjust and refine laws according to the social changes.
First, there is no absolute just or unjust laws and our legal system needs constant changes and improvements. Although some key figures, charismatic visionary such Washington, King, Gandhi are essential in promoting the social justice and fairness, it is the normal people, the public who effect the changes. I would argue that without the supports of each individuals, much of the social improvements would not take in place. The same-sex marriage laws proved the important role of individuals’ resistance. In the Middle Ages, the whole society considered the relationships between same-sex people as illegal and immoral. As the LGBT groups more bravely present their desires for same-sex marriage, as they more actively challenge the current marriage law, and as more individuals participate in the Pride Parade, the authorities hear the voices of LGBT groups, understand their demands and finally modified the law of marriage. This example adequately illustrated two points: first is the blurred line between just and unjust laws, and second is the enhanced human rights brought by the resistance of individuals against unjust laws.
Second, encouraging individual’s resistant behaviors and spirits against unjust laws does not apply only to the field of legislation, but also to the field of science and arts. In the world of science, there are also some conventional laws that all researchers adhere to. Similarly, in the field of art, artists conform with basic design principles. Nevertheless, neither the conventional scientific rules nor the traditional design principles are constantly true since we gain more understandings about the world and ourselves. The heliocentric theory, the humankind’s evolution from other form of life, the relativity of time and space, the existence of black hole, all these creative theories widened our scope of knowledge by challenging the conventional scientific laws established by precedents. Likewise, in the field of art, the impressionism, the sublime, the surrealism overthrew the traditional law of beauty which advocates strict symmetry.
In conclusion, I agree with the speaker’s argument that individuals are responsible to obey just laws but also to disobey and resist unjust laws. While they present their discontent, individuals should resort to peaceful measures and reject violent behaviors. Furthermore, the resistant spirits are essential not only for the unjust judicial laws but also for the incorrect scientific and artistic laws.
- Educational institutions should actively encourage their students to choose fields of study that will prepare them for lucrative careers. Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. 66
- 19. Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future. 建议Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation an 66
- 62. Leaders are created by the demands that are placed on them. 事实Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting you 66
- 94. The effectiveness of a country's leaders is best measured by examining the well-being of that country's citizens.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting you 66
- 48. Educators should teach facts only after their students have studied the ideas, trends, and concepts that help explain those facts. 建议Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explai 83
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, likewise, may, nevertheless, second, similarly, so, well, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 32.0 14.8657303371 215% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 33.0505617978 112% => OK
Preposition: 79.0 58.6224719101 135% => OK
Nominalization: 24.0 12.9106741573 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3859.0 2235.4752809 173% => OK
No of words: 679.0 442.535393258 153% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.68335787923 5.05705443957 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.10466731938 4.55969084622 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08931287139 2.79657885939 110% => OK
Unique words: 346.0 215.323595506 161% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.509572901325 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 1176.3 704.065955056 167% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 18.0 4.99550561798 360% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 32.0 20.2370786517 158% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.1692475915 60.3974514979 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.59375 118.986275619 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.21875 23.4991977007 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.09375 5.21951772744 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 18.0 5.13820224719 350% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233673868828 0.243740707755 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.062126278352 0.0831039109588 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0821367210701 0.0758088955206 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144556223271 0.150359130593 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0900278218075 0.0667264976115 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 14.1392134831 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 48.8420337079 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.66 12.1639044944 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.47 8.38706741573 113% => OK
difficult_words: 206.0 100.480337079 205% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.7820224719 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.