An ailing patient should have easy access to his or her doctor’s record of treating similarly afflicted patients. Through gaining such access, the ailing patient may better determine whether the doctor is competent to treat that medical condition.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
Yes, to the maximum extent I stand by the statement and I recommend this system to be applied in the medical field as well. This is not any new system these days in this world which runs on similar rating system for every minute thing on daily basis.
From the starting of the day, people order their daily goods from these suppliers like Big basket or Grofers and they keep giving reviews about the items they received for a better supply on the next day. If the quality doesn't seem to improve for multiple days they shift to the alternate option with a better service. This applies to the orders on food on Zomato or Swiggy, Accessories that are ordered on Amazon or Snapdeal or some random online apps which have an alternative.
When people are so particular about where to eat food from or where and which phone to buy from based on the reviews of the older users or based on the quality and history of the item, they are in every way deserving to select a doctor to get their issue treated based on his/her record of treating a similarly affected patient.
Usually, people from all these days didn't have access to any such data about a particular medical assistant's previous records to judge whether the doctor is competent enough to treat a medical condition or not. Their only chance of making such judgement is if some patient, who is an acquaintance, who has been treated by that doctor before gives a positive report on his service. This can sometimes be misleading. What if he the only one out of five patients who got treated well when somewhere around ten such patients approached for the same problem. There is a chance that there can be a doctor who treated 9/10 patients well which is obviously a better record. Same applies for the vice-versa.
Also, there are some issues that can cause a problem because of such access. To properly utilize such condition, the medical condition must first be assessed well. If the assessment is not made correctly based on all the dependent factors, there is no logic in approaching a doctor for treating that improperly assessed medical condition. Certainly, this doesn't make any sense when the problem is from a kidney issue and someone approaches a orthopedician of great reputation as he judged it to be a problem caused by his spine.
One more problem about such issue is the one with better ratings or better treatment history might make it a business of treating people as he can demand higher consultancy fee and other treatment related fares with higher increase in demand for that particular doctor.
Excluding few minor conditions, this can well bring awareness about the doctor to make a judgement on his previous.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-20 | JENIRSHAH | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | samruddh_shah | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-02 | Harshali_15 | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-30 | Masterji | 66 | view |
| 2019-11-26 | sarahaduwa | 66 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 221, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... supply on the next day. If the quality doesnt seem to improve for multiple days they ...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 37, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
... Usually, people from all these days didnt have access to any such data about a pa...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 99, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'assistant'?
Suggestion: assistant
...ny such data about a particular medical assistants previous records to judge whether the d...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 356, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ssed medical condition. Certainly, this doesnt make any sense when the problem is from...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 441, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...m a kidney issue and someone approaches a orthopedician of great reputation as he...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, similarly, so, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.3162921348 168% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 33.0505617978 106% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 58.6224719101 104% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2229.0 2235.4752809 100% => OK
No of words: 469.0 442.535393258 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7526652452 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65364457471 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46260257013 2.79657885939 88% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 215.323595506 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.481876332623 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 706.5 704.065955056 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 73.6208169702 60.3974514979 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.833333333 118.986275619 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0555555556 23.4991977007 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.21951772744 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.97078651685 141% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252836929511 0.243740707755 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.081380780418 0.0831039109588 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0723804152392 0.0758088955206 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113984794533 0.150359130593 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0894835318651 0.0667264976115 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 14.1392134831 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 48.8420337079 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 12.1639044944 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 100.480337079 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.8971910112 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.