An ailing patient should have easy access to his or her doctor’s record of treating similarly afflicted patients. Through gaining such access, the ailing patient may better determine whether the doctor is competent to treat that medical condition.
This prompt contends that ailing patient should have easy access to his or her doctor's record of treating similarly afflicted patients. with the help of that access, the ailing patient may determine whether the doctor is competent to treat the medical condition. In my opinion, I strongly agree with the suggestion and argue that all kinds of patients should get equal chance rather than only afflicted patients.
Firstly, there are some benefits that have been given to afflicted patients so that they can easily access to his or her doctor's record of treating. That is very useful for any patient to check or verify that the doctor who is going to him or her is competent to treat or not. Nowadays, in each and every area there is a kind of law that you should verify before using any service whether it is good for you or not.
In addition, the Company wants to hire an employee then HR of the company will check the skills of an employee whether he or she is able to satisfy our company's needs or not. Accordingly, HR is going to hire that particular employee in the company. If he or she fails to prove himself or herself then he or she will not get a chance. This prompt is strongly related to this example that the doctor has to prove that he is able to treat medical conditions.
For instance, in all the hospitals all the patients should get a chance to access his or her doctor's record so that he or she could decide accordingly that whether he or she is competent enough to do treatment or not. This example relates to this prompt that as all should get an equal opportunity to choose his or her doctor by accessing the record of treating.
To sum up, there should be no partiality among an ailing patient and afflicted patients. As afflicted patients get easy access to his or her doctor's record the same way the ailing patients should also get that easy access to a particular doctor's record of treating.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-20 | JENIRSHAH | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | samruddh_shah | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-02 | Harshali_15 | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-30 | Masterji | 66 | view |
| 2019-11-26 | sarahaduwa | 66 | view |
- “The Smith Corporation should not be permitted to develop the land that is now part of the Youngtown Wildlife Preserve. This sanctuary is essential to the survival of the 300 bird species that live in our area. Although only a small percentage of the la 25
- An ailing patient should have easy access to his or her doctor’s record of treating similarly afflicted patients. Through gaining such access, the ailing patient may better determine whether the doctor is competent to treat that medical condition. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 137, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: With
... treating similarly afflicted patients. with the help of that access, the ailing pat...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, first, firstly, if, may, similarly, so, then, as to, for instance, in addition, kind of, in my opinion, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 52.0 33.0505617978 157% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 58.6224719101 70% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1581.0 2235.4752809 71% => OK
No of words: 348.0 442.535393258 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.54310344828 5.05705443957 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40390008781 2.79657885939 86% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 215.323595506 65% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.405172413793 0.4932671777 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 482.4 704.065955056 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.1952926581 60.3974514979 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.928571429 118.986275619 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8571428571 23.4991977007 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.42857142857 5.21951772744 181% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.519174005023 0.243740707755 213% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.210176762848 0.0831039109588 253% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.18562502322 0.0758088955206 245% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.330428052313 0.150359130593 220% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.188185969204 0.0667264976115 282% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 48.8420337079 131% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.35 12.1639044944 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.87 8.38706741573 82% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 100.480337079 45% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.