An ailing patient should have easy access to his or her doctor's record of treating similarly afflicted patients. Through gaining such access, the ailing patient may better determine whether the doctor is competent to treat that medical condition.
When searching for medical care, every patient is on the hunt for the best and the brightest doctors that will give them the help that they need, and potentially save their life. All doctors have varying experiences, trainings, and educations that may better suit them for different procedures. Just as some hospitals are knows for their treatment of heart disease or cancer, certain doctors are specialized with extra training in a specified area of medicine. Patients should always have record of their doctors of previous patients where their treatment either went right or wrong.
Before treatment even begins, patients must make an informed decision on whether or not to have the treatment to begin with. Doctors typically lay out the risks, the benefits, and any possible scenarios that could play out after the treatment, or occur because of the treatment. Just as patients must be informed of these risks and benefits, the patient must know the level of experience their doctor has with their particular case. This information is equally as essential to making an informed decision about their health care as the potential risks and benefits are.
With any medical condition comes worry from the patient and the patient's family. With knowledge about cases similar to their own and how they have been treated in the past, patients can feel confident in their doctors ability resulting in decreased stress levels and more compliance with the doctors orders, which could result in a more successful outcome. Sharing this information with the patient allows for them to feel in controll of their own health and how it is managed. Everyone is in control of their own body, and everyone should be in control of their own health care and who they trust with their treatment.
The dispute over health care is a major dillemma in the United States, but people have a right to the best healthcare possible. If a doctor does not have the training or perfect treatment record that another doctor possesses, then the patient should have the right to go to the doctor with preferred skills. Patients deserve to know who they are trusting with their life and to have confidence in their choice of doctor. In all areas of life there are people who work hard and succeed and those who don't. Until a doctor proves their capabilities, no one should unknowingly follow through with bad treatment.
Releasing knowledge of the doctor's track record would also reduce the amount of lawsuits and other legal battles because the patient and their family have all the information available to make an informed decision. They would place less blame on malpractice and admit the severity of the condition, realizing that sometimes you can only do so much.
All patients deserve to have adequate health care and knowledge to make informed decsions about it. This is a basic right that anyone undergoing any treatment deserves to have. Just as there are good and bad artists, hairdressers, and lawyers, there are good and bad doctors that no one should be subjected to without the proper information.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-20 | JENIRSHAH | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | samruddh_shah | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-02 | Harshali_15 | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-30 | Masterji | 66 | view |
| 2019-11-26 | sarahaduwa | 66 | view |
- Techcorporation is our top pick for investment this term. We urge all of our clients to invest in this new company. For the first time in 10 years a company has developed satellite technology that has been approved by the FTA to compete with the current s 66
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoni 50
- Woven baskets characterized by a particular distinctive pattern have previously been found only in the immediate vicinity of the prehistoric village of Palea and therefore were believed to have been made only by the Palean people. Recently, however, archa 58
- The following appeared as part of the petition sent to residents of Youngtown by an environmental protection group.“The Smith Corporation should not be permitted to develop the land that is now part of the Youngtown Wildlife Preserve. This sanctuary is 66
- sports stars and movie stars have an obligation to behave as role models for the young people who look up to them. In return for the millions of dollars that they are paid, we should expect them to fulfill this societal responsibility. 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 74, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...ients must make an informed decision on whether or not to have the treatment to begin with. Do...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 454, Rule ID: EQUALLY_AS[1]
Message: Don't say 'equally as'. You can use either 'equally' or 'as' on its own. When comparing two nouns, use 'just as'.
Suggestion: equally; as; just as
...ir particular case. This information is equally as essential to making an informed decisio...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 65, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'patients'' or 'patient's'?
Suggestion: patients'; patient's
...on comes worry from the patient and the patients family. With knowledge about cases simi...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 500, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...who work hard and succeed and those who dont. Until a doctor proves their capabiliti...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, then, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 28.0 14.8657303371 188% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 33.0505617978 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 68.0 58.6224719101 116% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2579.0 2235.4752809 115% => OK
No of words: 514.0 442.535393258 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01750972763 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.76146701107 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49308951185 2.79657885939 89% => OK
Unique words: 240.0 215.323595506 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.466926070039 0.4932671777 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 774.0 704.065955056 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.740449438202 135% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.77640449438 394% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.1566831494 60.3974514979 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.227272727 118.986275619 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3636363636 23.4991977007 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.95454545455 5.21951772744 37% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222958616437 0.243740707755 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0804643018454 0.0831039109588 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0585494030123 0.0758088955206 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131322087398 0.150359130593 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0357508357535 0.0667264976115 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 48.8420337079 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 100.480337079 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.