All facts should be considered false as they can be changed in the future
By definition, facts are information that have been proven true with reasonable and available evidence. however, some might argue the "availability of evidence" in the definition leaves room for invalidation of facts. Over the years, many facts have been debunked by the discovery of new information. There was a time the earth was considered flat and this information was universally accepted as a fact, however, many years later, through the use of a telescope, it was discovered that this universally acceptable fact was fallacious. are we then supposed to disbelieve every information that is known to man? And if so, how do we make scientific discoveries, calculations and beliefs?
The realization of this problem is what defined the scientific community that we have today. The creation of the steps involved in the research of scientific facts was based on the need to have information that can be trusted by the scientific community. therefore, a scienfic process was created. The first step to any scientific process is the hypothesis or the assumption; this involves making educated guesses as to why a phenomenon is occuring. however, it is considered a scientific crime to automatically carry on an assumption to become a law without extensive research to the absoluteness of its application. The next in the scientific process is the testing stage, when a hypothesis is formed, the scientist is charged with the responsibility of proving the correctness of his hypothesis under varied conditions. if the hypothesis assumed does not fulfill the observed or expected outcomes, it becomes invalid, hence, it is either discarded or modified. Conversely, if the results of the extensive research shows the hypothesis to be correct, the scientist documents his results and shares it with a large audience of scientific researchers who in turn probes his discovery for loopholes. this system of check and balance is the pivot of the scientific community as it helps validify the information regarded as scientific facts.
The believe of the above process is that if the reason behind the occurrence of a certain phenomenon can be conclusively proven within available evidence/ circumstances known to man, it is possible to create technology which will work within these available situations, which is the goal of science.
One may however argue that the above process is still subject to the presence of available information. man can only probe what He knows. In this regard, it is possible to say that all information is questionable and possibly changeable in the future. it was believed that man cannot fly, however, the invention of aeroplanes provided a means by which man can fly to different destinations around the world. therefore, it is arguable that everything we know and believe to be true can be called to question with the innovation of a new device or theory.
conclusively, facts in its self are subject or limited to the knowledge available. hence, it is possible to believe that all we know can be changed one day, however, the presence of some facts proven to be true within available evidence is believed to be trustworthy enough to discover new information and is the bed rock by which the scientific community relies on.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2022-03-23 | EMMANUEL RANDLE | 73 | view |
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college 66
- The following appeared in a memorandum from the planning department of an electric power company Several recent surveys indicate that home owners are increasingly eager to conserve energy At the same time manufacturers are now marketing many home applianc 63
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college 78
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college 66
- In any situation progress requires discussion among people who have contrasting points of view Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In devel 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 105, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...with reasonable and available evidence. however, some might argue the 'availabilit...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 244, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r invalidation of facts. Over the years, many facts have been debunked by the dis...
^^
Line 1, column 548, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Are
...ersally acceptable fact was fallacious. are we then supposed to disbelieve every in...
^^^
Line 3, column 256, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Therefore
...be trusted by the scientific community. therefore, a scienfic process was created. The fi...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 451, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...ses as to why a phenomenon is occuring. however, it is considered a scientific crime to...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 824, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: If
...his hypothesis under varied conditions. if the hypothesis assumed does not fulfill...
^^
Line 3, column 1200, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...urn probes his discovery for loopholes. this system of check and balance is the pivo...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ation regarded as scientific facts. The believe of the above process is that if the re...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 5, Rule ID: BELIEVE_BELIEF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'belief' (noun) instead of believe (verb)?
Suggestion: belief
...n regarded as scientific facts. The believe of the above process is that if the re...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 44, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... believe of the above process is that if the reason behind the occurrence of a ce...
^^
Line 7, column 105, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Man
... the presence of available information. man can only probe what He knows. In this r...
^^^
Line 7, column 253, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
... and possibly changeable in the future. it was believed that man cannot fly, howev...
^^
Line 7, column 409, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Therefore
...ifferent destinations around the world. therefore, it is arguable that everything we know...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Conclusively
...novation of a new device or theory. conclusively, facts in its self are subject or limit...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 84, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Hence
... or limited to the knowledge available. hence, it is possible to believe that all we ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, first, hence, however, if, may, so, still, then, therefore, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 41.0 19.5258426966 210% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 33.0505617978 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 72.0 58.6224719101 123% => OK
Nominalization: 30.0 12.9106741573 232% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2744.0 2235.4752809 123% => OK
No of words: 530.0 442.535393258 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17735849057 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.79809637944 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14568310208 2.79657885939 112% => OK
Unique words: 244.0 215.323595506 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.460377358491 0.4932671777 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 883.8 704.065955056 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.99550561798 200% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.673909652 60.3974514979 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.304347826 118.986275619 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0434782609 23.4991977007 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.34782608696 5.21951772744 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 15.0 7.80617977528 192% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189523443373 0.243740707755 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0491703325457 0.0831039109588 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0692390123941 0.0758088955206 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126710490832 0.150359130593 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0802036181408 0.0667264976115 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 14.1392134831 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 48.8420337079 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 12.1639044944 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 100.480337079 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.