All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary.
There is an implicit assumption wraped up in the statement under consideration. The assumption is that 'employees speak up.' Given that this assumption this true, then I may be of greater support of this statement, but it all too often the case that few employees speak up. Employees may mumour among each other but if it is the case that they rarely speak up, then there is nothing to even listen to in the first place.
Yes, the statement might be true suppose employees speak up, first, because they are directly at the intersection of the work and tend to understand the nitty gritty of the work more than an outsider can. Because of this, listening to them might actually be the best thing companies might do for themselves. Secondly, because they understand the nitty gritty and pain points of the companies, they are good a audience of focus on when trying to discover the issues that needs urgent attention.
However, while they may be good at pointing all out pain points, it cannot be said conclusively that the companies have internal capabilities to fix frictions that might have been pointed out. For instance, the case of technology breakdown, expperts are often needed to fix this, or the developer of the technology itself may be required for a fix.
In light of this, the statement I am of the opnion that the place consultant cannot be ruled out even if companies listen to their employees. At best listening to employees will help to know where exactly friction lies and help direct the focus of companies while engaging consultants.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-26 | Arpit Sahni | 58 | view |
| 2020-01-24 | shamitha | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-18 | JENIRSHAH | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-17 | caseya5 | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-14 | Siddiqur Rahman | 50 | view |
- All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary. 50
- Many lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flu were routinely administered to all people in areas where the disease is detected. However, since there is a small possibility that a person will die as a result of the inoculations, we cannot permi 63
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 408, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... points of the companies, they are good a audience of focus on when trying to dis...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, however, if, may, second, secondly, then, while, for instance, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 58.6224719101 67% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1301.0 2235.4752809 58% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 268.0 442.535393258 61% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85447761194 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.55969084622 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63342972284 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 215.323595506 64% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.514925373134 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 383.4 704.065955056 54% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.2370786517 54% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.6399963143 60.3974514979 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.272727273 118.986275619 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3636363636 23.4991977007 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.36363636364 5.21951772744 179% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183527647846 0.243740707755 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0707805597138 0.0831039109588 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.067047953182 0.0758088955206 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117215548209 0.150359130593 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0583273671536 0.0667264976115 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 14.1392134831 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 48.8420337079 131% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 12.1639044944 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 100.480337079 52% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.