All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary.
Mostly, companies tend to look for freelance consultants to help increase the company's productivity. Whether or not that is the right approach is a puzzling question, to say the least. May be the problems need out of the box thinking, maybe the company needs smarter employees, or maybe the company needs to listen to its own people and try to understand what would help them perform better. Either ways there can be many factors at stake. Let's take a look at some of them.
While the priority of any employee at a certain company should be the company's well being, usually that is not the case. Concern about personal life, career trajectory, office politics, etc. can often make the company's own employees look at problems more subjectively. While some disadvantages may come from it, taking an outside counsel is an objective way of looking at the problems the company may be facing. Consultants, not having a direct stake at the direction the company's employees' career, can suggest swift methods to strengthen efficiency from staying outside the loop.
In addition, the consultants usually hired to assess an organization and help improve them are experts at doing this. More often than not, they have significant experience in dealing with similar problems, if not similar companies. Problems that might seem gigantic for the CEO of that company might look rather small to these cosultants, provided they know which way any decision made might lead. In a way, it is better for a company to hire outside counsel, as it offers wisdom without learning it the harder way.
One adverse effect this might have on the company is the fact that this can affect the morale of the employees. They may, and surely will, feel that their opinion is undervalued. It is logical in a sense that they are one of the real stakeholders in this case. While the suggestions may be invaluable, undermining their own employees can sometimes be of more risk than gain.
As opposed to an outside counsel, an employee working at the company may have some good things to offer too. They are the ones facing the real problems, and sometimes they can be very personal and sensitive. As opposed to opening these subtle issues for scrutiny, talking about them personally may help solve them faster and more effectively, keeping certain things discreet. The alternates to really talking to the people facing the problems and solving them are very little.
Furthermore, despite the similarities in problems, every company is unique in its own ways. The level of enthusiasm, the cohort, the workforce's career expectations, workplace dynamics and many other arbitrary things are extremely unique for every single company. The people actively living in these situations may, therefore, provide more means to increase the effectivity of the company.
In summary, when efficiency is the concern, talking to their own employees may help improve efficiency better than taking outside counsel. While the expert opinion is priceless, existing employees are the heart and soul of the company and keeping their morale up can increase productivity more than just cutting some extra costs.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-31 | ashiqshawon1994 | 66 | view |
- Pirouettes Ballet School is the clear choice for any child. Of all the dance schools in Elmtown, Pirouettes has the most intensive program, and our teachers have danced in the most prestigious ballet companies all over the world. Many of our students have 69
- All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary. 66
- Mass media and the internet have caused people’s attention spans to get shorter. However, the overall effect has been positive: while people are less able to focus on one thing, they more than make up for it with an enhanced ability to sort through lar 83
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers. 50
- Some people believe that teaching morality should be the foundation of education. Others believe that teaching a foundation of logical reasoning would do more to produce a moral society 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 102, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'Whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: Whether
...elp increase the companys productivity. Whether or not that is the right approach is a puzzlin...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 190, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (May) must be used with a third-person verb: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
...uzzling question, to say the least. May be the problems need out of the box thinki...
^^
Line 1, column 441, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...ays there can be many factors at stake. Lets take a look at some of them. While...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, look, may, really, so, then, therefore, thus, well, while, in addition, in summary, talking about
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 24.0 12.4196629213 193% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 37.0 33.0505617978 112% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 58.6224719101 101% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2659.0 2235.4752809 119% => OK
No of words: 519.0 442.535393258 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12331406551 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.7730044521 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65791775408 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 250.0 215.323595506 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.481695568401 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 818.1 704.065955056 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 10.0 3.10617977528 322% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.2370786517 133% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.8145359699 60.3974514979 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.4814814815 118.986275619 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2222222222 23.4991977007 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.22222222222 5.21951772744 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.97078651685 141% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.329704016171 0.243740707755 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0887678222961 0.0831039109588 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0730702317586 0.0758088955206 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165647368583 0.150359130593 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.058924514749 0.0667264976115 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 14.1392134831 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 100.480337079 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.