All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary.
While working in a group, you need to have collective inputs from each and every person, to get the desird output. Similarly, in a comapny with employees, where-in company tend to hire more consultants, when they are having enough employees, the companies efficiency won't increase that much. I completely disagree with the fact that companies hiring consultants in order to increase their efficiency, when they have employees.
Firstly, whenever a new consultant is hired, it is required for the company to train the consultant, provide him with knowledege that would be required for working in the company. Various tools, methods that are implemented for the functioning of company, whereas when the company already has employees with the required knowledge, it becomes feasible for a company for getting the desired output, which would be efficient and completed in given time. Consultants would require time, processing about how the process works around in the company they have been assigned. This would take certain time and the work would be delayed. So it is better to assign task to employees rather than getting consultants, if time and efficiency is the factor of consideration.
Also, if we observe hired consultants have a large payscale in comparison to the employees. This would impact the total profit of the company as well. For example, If a person say Mr.John and Mr.Pete are the consultants hired to do similar job like Mrs.Kate, who is an employee in the company. But John and Pete are less experienced then Kate, whereas Kate is well experienced, but John and Pete are hired to do the job of Kate, the efficiency provided by both of them will be less and the delivery would be late. Also John and Pete are receiving more pay then Kate, this would hamper companies profit and efficiency.
Thirdly, when hiring consultants while having employees to work, would discourage the morale and confidence that employees have. It would hamper the working environment, where-in employees might tend to feel ignored and would put less input in the task assgined to them. In the above example of John, Pete and Kate, Kate might tend to feel ignored and might put less efforts in the task given to her. Also, when companies hire consultants, employees who have longer plan to stay in the same company and flourish, might get disinterested in the company.
In order, to have better efficiency, companies should focus on the resources they have and try to encourage them, to put better inputs in the companies progress. Hiring new consultants would discourage the existing employees and in turn reduce revenue of the company.Companies should train their employees and work together to get the efficiency.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-26 | Arpit Sahni | 58 | view |
| 2020-01-24 | shamitha | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-18 | JENIRSHAH | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-17 | caseya5 | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-14 | Siddiqur Rahman | 50 | view |
- Society should make efforts to save endangered species only if the potential extinction of those species is the result of human activities. 79
- In an attempt to improve highway safety, Prunty County last year lowered its speed limit from 55 to 45 miles per hour on all county highways. But this effort has failed: the number of accidents has not decreased, and, based on reports by the highway patro 42
- All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary. 54
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 247, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'companies'' or 'company's'?
Suggestion: companies'; company's
...n they are having enough employees, the companies efficiency wont increase that much. I c...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 306, Rule ID: AGREE_WITH_THE_FACT[1]
Message: Use simply 'disagree that'.
Suggestion: disagree that
...y wont increase that much. I completely disagree with the fact that companies hiring consultants in order t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 184, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: John
...s well. For example, If a person say Mr.John and Mr.Pete are the consultants hired t...
^^^^
Line 9, column 196, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Pete
...example, If a person say Mr.John and Mr.Pete are the consultants hired to do similar...
^^^^
Line 9, column 201, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
...le, If a person say Mr.John and Mr.Pete are the consultants hired to do similar job...
^^^
Line 9, column 201, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Pete) must be used with a third-person verb: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
...le, If a person say Mr.John and Mr.Pete are the consultants hired to do similar job...
^^^
Line 9, column 254, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Kate
...ltants hired to do similar job like Mrs.Kate, who is an employee in the company. But...
^^^^
Line 9, column 334, Rule ID: LESS_MORE_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'than'?
Suggestion: than
... But John and Pete are less experienced then Kate, whereas Kate is well experienced,...
^^^^
Line 9, column 515, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...be less and the delivery would be late. Also John and Pete are receiving more pay th...
^^^^
Line 9, column 557, Rule ID: LESS_MORE_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'than'?
Suggestion: than
...so John and Pete are receiving more pay then Kate, this would hamper companies profi...
^^^^
Line 13, column 363, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun efforts is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...ight tend to feel ignored and might put less efforts in the task given to her. Also,...
^^^^
Line 17, column 268, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Companies
...d in turn reduce revenue of the company.Companies should train their employees and work t...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, similarly, so, then, third, thirdly, well, whereas, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 12.4196629213 161% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 58.6224719101 97% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2284.0 2235.4752809 102% => OK
No of words: 447.0 442.535393258 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1096196868 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.59808378696 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76021664913 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 215.323595506 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.451901565996 0.4932671777 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 692.1 704.065955056 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 3.10617977528 290% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.9066163961 60.3974514979 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.210526316 118.986275619 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5263157895 23.4991977007 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.31578947368 5.21951772744 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 12.0 7.80617977528 154% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.305748609113 0.243740707755 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117017650359 0.0831039109588 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0684465141147 0.0758088955206 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191836657643 0.150359130593 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0491251695538 0.0667264976115 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 14.1392134831 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 48.8420337079 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 100.480337079 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.