All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary.
Companies hire consultants when they need them to help bring a new perspective to a company's current problems with business goals like efficiency. Consultants come from an outside firm, where they are trained to analyze efficiency of businesses, and can be brought in to make big change at a company. Although consultants are often not popular because they often have to make tough decisions when it comes to a company's operations, they are necessary because they have the experience and training to analyze efficiency, and they have an outside view of the company that cannot be achieved by merely working with a company's own employees.
Consultants are trained to analyze efficiency. The process for becoming a management or strategic consultant is quite rigorous, and very few of the applicants end up being able to pursue careers in consulting. The people who do become consultants are often from some of the best universities in the country. They are then trained specifically to work on efficiency problems of a business. Although listening to a company's own employees might sound like a sensible idea, most of those employees' jobs are not to analyze the efficiency of the company. They do not have training in analyzing that specific type of problem, and often, they aren't necessarily thinking in that mindset. Most employees do not have the overall view of the company that the consultants do, and without the training and focus that consultants have on efficiency, employees are unable to help the company in the same way consultants can.
Secondly, consultants have experience doing this before. As mentioned previously, very few employees at a business have a job description that involves analyzing the overall efficiency of a business, and it is even less likely that any of them have done so before. Consultants bring a wealth of experience to the table. They have likely analyzed similar problems at other companies, and are able to bring the most successful solutions from those companies into any new project that they work on. Consultants work with many different businesses, and can easily compare and learn from issues they have experienced with different companies, often even being able to compare across different industries, which employees at one business may not have any familiarity with.
Lastly, consultants are necessary because they have an outside view of the entire company. Employees have value in discussions of effiency because they have an inside view that consultants cannot see in the short period of time that they work with a singular company. Employee input is important, but consultants are also vital because they are able to see the business from a broader, outside view. Consultants are able to face harsh realities of the company's needs for efficiency which employees on the inside may not be able to do because of personal attachments to the company. Consultants often have to make tough calls like firing people or massively changing the structure of a company, which employees on the inside are less likely to do.
Consultants and inside employees of a business are both important to analyzing and improving a company's efficiency. Leaders of the company likely begin with trying to maximize efficiency by working with their own employees, however, when that fails, they turn to consultants. Consultants are necessary in addition to the company's existing employees because they are trained specifically to analyze effieiency, they have the experience with dealing with these issues before, and they have an outsider's view, where they are able to make tough decisions to help maximize a company's efficiency.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-26 | Arpit Sahni | 58 | view |
| 2020-01-24 | shamitha | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-18 | JENIRSHAH | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-17 | caseya5 | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-14 | Siddiqur Rahman | 50 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 498, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'analyzing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'train' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: analyzing
...e they have the experience and training to analyze efficiency, and they have an outside vi...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 636, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: aren't
...ecific type of problem, and often, they arent necessarily thinking in that mindset. M...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 519, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...hat they work on. Consultants work with many different businesses, and can easily compare and ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 214, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...hat consultants cannot see in the short period of time that they work with a singular company....
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 17, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...the inside are less likely to do. Consultants and inside employees of a business are ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, lastly, may, second, secondly, so, then, in addition, in the same way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.3162921348 177% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 33.0505617978 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 101.0 58.6224719101 172% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3085.0 2235.4752809 138% => OK
No of words: 591.0 442.535393258 134% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21996615905 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.93056706295 4.55969084622 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8738237955 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 215.323595506 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.377326565144 0.4932671777 76% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 993.6 704.065955056 141% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 10.0 1.77640449438 563% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 74.8859750738 60.3974514979 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.130434783 118.986275619 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6956521739 23.4991977007 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.04347826087 5.21951772744 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221944272319 0.243740707755 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.091771580797 0.0831039109588 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0578381014013 0.0758088955206 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165491340083 0.150359130593 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0572274774513 0.0667264976115 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 14.1392134831 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 48.8420337079 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.1639044944 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.63 8.38706741573 91% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 100.480337079 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.8971910112 160% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.