All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary.
As someone has rightly said it is best left at the experts to figure out how to run the business. In my opinion it is in best interest of company to bring onboard external consultants to help suggest the best ways to operate efficiently. I do not agree that only by listening to their employees a company can come up with a plan to operate efficiently and i argue base on the below two points.
Firstly, the external consultants which companies hire possess specialized skill and they excel in building up such charters and plans which they have executed successfully in the industry. consider the example of mercer a world renowned HR consultancy firm which outsource their consultants to many different companies of the world. these consultants are experts in building up a new organization hierarchy or restructuring an existing organization hierarchy. many companies of the world have utilized the special service provided by mercer consultants and have either built a brand new org hierarchy based on the guidelines and inputs provided by these consultants or have restructured their old org hierarchy to align with a new strategy. The companies have been benefitted immensely by following the inputs they have received from the consultants. such huge organization level changes cannot be implemented only by listening to existing employees.
Secondly, external consultants full time job is to think and come up with a plan which can be used by their client to run efficiently and it is not that the consultants are doing this work part time. this point is important to note as employees of the company are not essentially working full time to come up with a plan to operate efficiently. The employees of the company have their daily job function which might necessarily not be operation efficiency plan and hence the employee focus might lag which may result in not so thorough analysis of the scenarios which is currently impacting efficiency. example in a technology company seeking operation efficiency can have employees who are software developer whose daily job is to write code. If those software developers are to share inputs on how to operate efficiently they might not be able to cover all the aspects required to be successful. To elaborate further, the consultants are the experts whose sole purpose and day job is to device a plan which will bring operation efficiency and other employees of the company have other tasks to deal with and they might not essentially be equipped with right skills to device such an operational efficiency plan.
One might argue that the existing employees of the company are aware of work environment, understand what can work within the company and understand their organization receptiveness to the change and hence they are the right source of inputs for the company which targets to improve efficiency but as described in the above examples these pros that we initially find are overtaken by the benefits and skills an external consultant brings to the table. Eventhough external consultants come from an outside world they bring in a new perspective and hence are more beneficial than just considering the existing perspective.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-26 | Arpit Sahni | 58 | view |
| 2020-01-24 | shamitha | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-18 | JENIRSHAH | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-17 | caseya5 | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-14 | Siddiqur Rahman | 50 | view |
- The following appeared in a memo from a vice president of a large, highly diversified company."Ten years ago our company had two new office buildings constructed as regional headquarters for two regions. The buildings were erected by different constr 55
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position 50
- Teachers' salaries should be based on their students' academic performance. 66
- As we acquire more knowledge, things do not become more comprehensible, but more complex and mysterious. 66
- Claim While boredom is often expressed with a sense of self satisfaction it should really be a source of embarrassment Reason Boredom arises from a lack of imagination and self motivation 40
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
As someone has rightly said it is best lef...
^^
Line 1, column 119, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'in the best'.
Suggestion: in the best
...o run the business. In my opinion it is in best interest of company to bring onboard ex...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 357, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
... with a plan to operate efficiently and i argue base on the below two points. ...
^
Line 7, column 191, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Consider
... executed successfully in the industry. consider the example of mercer a world renowned ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 296, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...rm which outsource their consultants to many different companies of the world. these consultan...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 335, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: These
... many different companies of the world. these consultants are experts in building up ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 425, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... organization hierarchy or restructuring an existing organization hierarchy. many...
^^
Line 7, column 463, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Many
...ng an existing organization hierarchy. many companies of the world have utilized th...
^^^^
Line 7, column 854, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Such
...hey have received from the consultants. such huge organization level changes cannot ...
^^^^
Line 13, column 32, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: fulltime
... Secondly, external consultants full time job is to think and come up with a plan...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 190, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: part-time
...hat the consultants are doing this work part time. this point is important to note as emp...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 201, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...sultants are doing this work part time. this point is important to note as employees...
^^^^
Line 13, column 289, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: fulltime
...the company are not essentially working full time to come up with a plan to operate effic...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 604, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Example
...hich is currently impacting efficiency. example in a technology company seeking operati...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 684, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...operation efficiency can have employees who are software developer whose daily job is t...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 745, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...loper whose daily job is to write code. If those software developers are to share ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, hence, if, may, second, secondly, so, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 77.0 58.6224719101 131% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2684.0 2235.4752809 120% => OK
No of words: 524.0 442.535393258 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12213740458 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.7844588288 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91821974794 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 215.323595506 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.435114503817 0.4932671777 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 853.2 704.065955056 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 23.0359550562 130% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 89.4862692682 60.3974514979 148% => OK
Chars per sentence: 157.882352941 118.986275619 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.8235294118 23.4991977007 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.23529411765 5.21951772744 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 16.0 7.80617977528 205% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.313364261664 0.243740707755 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112921201958 0.0831039109588 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0503760597982 0.0758088955206 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198738897754 0.150359130593 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00753324197815 0.0667264976115 11% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 14.1392134831 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.03 48.8420337079 84% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 12.1743820225 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.01 12.1639044944 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 100.480337079 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 11.2143820225 125% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.