All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary.Write a response in which you discu

Essay topics:

All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with these statements and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statements might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.

The claim that rather than hiring outside consultants to suggest ways for a company to operate efficiently companies should spend more time listening to their employees is sound to a extent. Be it a small scaled or a large scale company, everyone has a desire to operate more efficiently than they have ever been. Too often, companies hire outside consultants and assign them the task of doing so.

A outsider to the company can provide a dispassionate view about the company and its entities. He/She has to perform his task of increasing the efficacy of a company and he can do so without a partial or biased view.

Morever the outsider is also well-versed in the field of consulting, which is why the company may have approached him. So he can perform better at the task of consulting ways for growth of a company compared to what the employees of a company who are novice in the field could do. The consultant is well-equipped with all the methodologies which could be taken in practice leading to higher efficiency of a company. So he can solve problems which might be abstruse for a general employee.

Also, a consultant is a third-party viewer of the company. Many a times we oversimplify the scenarios our company might be facing, Or we might not be able to catch certain faults with out system. A consultant can scrutinize the matter at hand deeply in-order to unearth all such anomalies that might be existing.

However, a consultant can view only as much as the company wishes him to see. The company can have many details which are obscured from the view of consultant. The employees within the company can provide a better knowledge about those things, The employees know the situation at company better than a consultant in some cases. Like say, the working culture, reason behind employees leaving the company, etc. An employee of the company might provide better insights into these matters through their experience in the company.

An employee of a company can view the shortcomings more closely. They can answer questions such as what needs to be improved to attract more clients, or to maintain existing ones, how can they improve the customer satisfaction, what changes can be made in the work environment etc.

Though an employee might be helpful with all those above mentioned questions but the question as to how would the identified changes by the employee be implemented in the company still remains. For the employee will only provide you with insights to problems existing but not necessarily the solutions to deal with them.

Hence we can say, the reliance of companies on outside consultants have some shortcomings and the opinions of employee provide a valid point in many cases. But the efficiency of a company cannot be solely improved by spending more time listening to the employees solely. The best result could possibly be achieved by both entities, A consultant and an employee working together in increasing the efficiency of the company.

Votes
Average: 5.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-26 Arpit Sahni 58 view
2020-01-24 shamitha 66 view
2020-01-18 JENIRSHAH 50 view
2020-01-17 caseya5 66 view
2020-01-14 Siddiqur Rahman 50 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user Harshali_15 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 182, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...istening to their employees is sound to a extent. Be it a small scaled or a large...
^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'An' instead of 'A' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: An
...n them the task of doing so. A outsider to the company can provide a d...
^
Line 25, column 65, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a time' or simply 'times'?
Suggestion: a time; times
...third-party viewer of the company. Many a times we oversimplify the scenarios our compa...
^^^^^^^
Line 25, column 180, Rule ID: WITH_OUT[1]
Message: This word is usually written together. Did you mean 'without'?
Suggestion: without
...ght not be able to catch certain faults with out system. A consultant can scrutinize the...
^^^^^^^^
Line 57, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...olutions to deal with them. Hence we can say, the reliance of companies o...
^^^^^
Line 57, column 288, Rule ID: MAY_COULD_POSSIBLY[1]
Message: Use simply 'could'.
Suggestion: could
...o the employees solely. The best result could possibly be achieved by both entities, A consult...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 57, column 424, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...creasing the efficiency of the company.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, may, so, still, third, well, as to, such as, in many cases, in some cases

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 27.0 12.4196629213 217% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 72.0 58.6224719101 123% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2567.0 2235.4752809 115% => OK
No of words: 504.0 442.535393258 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09325396825 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.73813722054 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76994857549 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 215.323595506 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.448412698413 0.4932671777 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 774.0 704.065955056 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 15.0 4.99550561798 300% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.9369359541 60.3974514979 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.958333333 118.986275619 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 23.4991977007 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 5.21951772744 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 8.0 4.97078651685 161% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.38186539439 0.243740707755 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130480975959 0.0831039109588 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0932780055648 0.0758088955206 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199486438797 0.150359130593 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.099313421818 0.0667264976115 149% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 14.1392134831 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.8420337079 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 100.480337079 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.