All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with these statements and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statements might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
In archaic times, there were processes and procedures that would hire required individuals to accomplish a work in the company.In today's ever changing corporate world, companies would want the work done in brisk of a momemt. As a result to increase the efficiency and reduce the time taken for delivery of a task, companies have started delegating some work to set of consultants, commonly a group of external firm that hold specialized expertise in a field.
Although there is an ongoing discussion in the corporate industry over hiring consultants to do the job of an onshore employee , it can be agreed than recruiting consultant increase the pace of delivery in a company. This is because of the fact that most of the consultant firms are full of individuals that have an expertise doing the type of work for which a consultant firm is created. This reduces the burden from the shoulders of recruiting company to search expertise in the market. Moreover, most of the tasks for which a consultant is brought into company are short term and so it is not advisable to go through the pain of finding right expertise for a transient work. For example, if a company wants to complete their tax records once a year, it is rather easy to hire an experienced consultant firm to do the same rather than looking for an accountant every year.
Another important point to consider here is there can be certain jobs in a company that do not flow in the bucket of a single user group. For example, reconciliation of financial statements to present to an investor of a private equity fund is a task that should be touches both operations and accounting teams, whoich might function independendly. At such senarios, bringing in a consultant that can bridge gap between the two teams and can give inputs from both the ends, thereby increasing the efficiency of reconciliation.
While employers continue to hire consultants for specialized jobs as mentioned above, it cannot be implied that companies have stopped listening to their own employees. A recent study showed that most companies hire consultants for expert advice but end decision is taken after discussion with current employees of the company. To conclude, even if companies spend more time with theie employees, consultants would still be necessary to bring in additional views in the discussion
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-26 | Arpit Sahni | 58 | view |
| 2020-01-24 | shamitha | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-18 | JENIRSHAH | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-17 | caseya5 | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-14 | Siddiqur Rahman | 50 | view |
- Many lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flu were routinely administered to all people in areas where the disease is detected. However, since there is a small possibility that a person will die as a result of the inoculations, we cannot permi 63
- All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary.Write a response in which you discu 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 128, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...als to accomplish a work in the company.In todays ever changing corporate world, c...
^^
Line 3, column 127, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...nts to do the job of an onshore employee , it can be agreed than recruiting consul...
^^
Line 3, column 226, Rule ID: BECAUSE_OF_THE_FACT_THAT[1]
Message: This phrase is redundant. Use simply 'because'.
Suggestion: because
... pace of delivery in a company. This is because of the fact that most of the consultant firms are full o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, moreover, so, still, while, for example, in addition, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 33.0505617978 51% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 58.6224719101 99% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1966.0 2235.4752809 88% => OK
No of words: 393.0 442.535393258 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00254452926 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45244063426 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89353014228 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 215.323595506 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529262086514 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 608.4 704.065955056 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 23.0359550562 130% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 36.335712786 60.3974514979 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.230769231 118.986275619 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.2307692308 23.4991977007 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.15384615385 5.21951772744 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.342749470368 0.243740707755 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127263401238 0.0831039109588 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0706329546193 0.0758088955206 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205853803992 0.150359130593 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101766897972 0.0667264976115 153% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 14.1392134831 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 100.480337079 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.8971910112 160% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 11.2143820225 125% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.