All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with these statements and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statements might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position
The first thing to note in order to effectively justify or disagree with this statement is the juxta positioning of the expertise of the consultants and the employees.
While it would be very okay to agree with the stated position, the expertise of the consultants must be examined. For example, for one to be a consultant, there is an expectation that such a person must be a pundit or authority in that field. This will definitely be of immense advantage to the company by leveraging on the wealth of experience such consultant possesses. By adjucating several similar companies’ decisions and proven record of success in that endeavor, taking a consultant to advance the operation, profit, and system of a company would be a great plus.
However, in situation where the said consultant is not well experienced as compared to an average employee, then hiring such consultant would be unnecessary and could be harmful to the company. For example, he can give advices that could be detrimental to the advancement of the company. Also, the cost of hiring such a maladroit individual are most times high, considering their pays, thereby affecting the purse of the company.
Hiring an imperious consultant may also pose a threat to the employees. For example, if the ways suggested by the consultant are not okay, the employees might feel insecure and undervalued, thereby reducing their work morale, productivity, security and resulting to the devolving of the company rather than its advancement. Also hiring a consultant to suggest ways to advance the operation of a company may prove inefficient especially when the opinions and views of the employees are not valued, for most times, by reason of proximity, employees are more familiar with the operations of a company and can suggest the best solutions for advancing operations, However, if they are bad employees and their opinions are not valued, they would not like the ideas suggested by the consultant to come into fruition.
In conclusion, while it might be okay to hire skilled and beneficial consultants to advance the policies and operations of a company, hiring an unskilled one may be to the detriment of a company. Also, promotion of the ideas and opinions of employees could offer immense gains than that of an outsider as this makes the employees to feel valued.
- Many lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flu were routinely administered to all people in areas where the disease is detected However since there is a small possibility that a person will die as a result of the inoculations we cannot permit i 52
- All too often companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees such consultants would be unnecessary Write a response in which you discuss 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 325, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...he company rather than its advancement. Also hiring a consultant to suggest ways to ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 698, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., However, if they are bad employees and their opinions are not valued, they woul...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, may, so, then, well, while, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 33.0505617978 51% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 58.6224719101 94% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1959.0 2235.4752809 88% => OK
No of words: 386.0 442.535393258 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07512953368 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43248042346 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94715394832 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 215.323595506 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.458549222798 0.4932671777 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 627.3 704.065955056 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 23.0359550562 126% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 100.545023622 60.3974514979 166% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.692307692 118.986275619 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.6923076923 23.4991977007 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.15384615385 5.21951772744 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.377459603194 0.243740707755 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131009841844 0.0831039109588 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0729908450495 0.0758088955206 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189074570927 0.150359130593 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102819337737 0.0667264976115 154% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 14.1392134831 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 48.8420337079 86% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 12.1743820225 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.78 12.1639044944 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.38706741573 108% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 100.480337079 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 11.2143820225 121% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.