All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would unnecessary
The statement provided to us for analysis is 'All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary'. The topic for discussion here is whether companies should hire consultants or should pay more attention to what their employees have to say so that the company can operate more efficiently.
Within any company there are multiple verticals running simultaneously such as Finance, Operations, Human Resources etc. Typically consultants are hired to assit with the operations of one of these verticals. The areas of assistance could include improving profits, devising new strategies for expansion, improving the culture of the organization, improving the supply chain functions and so on. Consultants have specific areas of expertise, having worked with multiple organizations, to help solve similar set of problems. The rich knowledge and experience that these consultants bring to the table can help companies immensely.
The author's opinion is based on an assumption that once companies do not pay heed to what their employees have to say once external consultants are hired. This need not be the case. The best way of operation is to make sure that the hired consultants and the company employees work in tandem. The consultants begin with speaking to the employees, understanding the problem areas and the possible reasons for the problems. They then devise strategies and solutions taking into consideration the issues at hand and their knowledge of how competitor firms are handling such issues. These strategies are time and again discussed with the employees, as eventually it is these employees who would help implement these strategies effectively.
It should be the responsiblity of the leadership or the business heads to ensure that there is a proper system and process in place when hiring consultants that ensures that the consultants and employees have an ongoing collaboration, all necessary resources are made available to the consultants be it data, support, time etc. and that the employees are always kept in loop of how the problem statement provided to the consultants is being solved.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-23 | Hitman22 | 50 | view |
| 2024-11-23 | Hitman22 | 50 | view |
| 2024-08-10 | Bholuchand | 58 | view |
| 2023-10-15 | Aishwarya01 | 54 | view |
| 2023-09-30 | Isolus | 66 | view |
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government industry or other fields is instilling in them a sense of cooperation not competition 83
- Argument Topic The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company According to a recent report from our marketing department during the past year fewer people attended Super Screen produced movies 58
- Pirouettes Ballet School is the clear choice for any child Of all the dance schools in Elmtown Pirouettes has the most intensive program and our teachers have danced in the most prestigious ballet companies all over the world Many of our students have gon 59
- Company management should conduct routine monitoring of all employee e mail correspondence Such monitoring will reduce the waste of resources such as time and system capacity as well as protect the company from lawsuits Write a response in which you discu 66
- Rising sea level 65
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 5, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...e can help companies immensely. The authors opinion is based on an assumption that ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, then, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.6327345309 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.9520958084 69% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 11.1786427146 107% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 13.6137724551 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 28.8173652695 80% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 55.5748502994 72% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 16.3942115768 73% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1922.0 2260.96107784 85% => OK
No of words: 356.0 441.139720559 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39887640449 5.12650576532 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.56307096286 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03654153967 2.78398813304 109% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 204.123752495 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505617977528 0.468620217663 108% => OK
syllable_count: 595.8 705.55239521 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.96107784431 81% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.76447105788 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.70958083832 74% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 19.7664670659 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.8473053892 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.3859460707 57.8364921388 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.125 119.503703932 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 23.324526521 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.3125 5.70786347227 23% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.15768463074 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.25449101796 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.20758483034 122% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 6.88822355289 29% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.67664670659 86% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.502489641737 0.218282227539 230% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.164900691083 0.0743258471296 222% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.15716162227 0.0701772020484 224% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.315593695231 0.128457276422 246% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.226736237089 0.0628817314937 361% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 14.3799401198 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 48.3550499002 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 12.197005988 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 12.5979740519 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.32208582834 104% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 98.500998004 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 12.3882235529 93% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.1389221557 97% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.9071856287 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.