All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary.
Employees form the essence of the company they are a part of. They know its everyday functioning from a first hand perspective. Most of the time in an employee's day is spent at their working place. It becomes their second home and all of their actions are in the best interest of the company. The prompt recommends that instead of hiring outside consultants to improve the efficiency of a company, they should take feedback and listen to their own employees. I moderately agree with this suggestion for the following reasons and argue that companies should first pay heed to what their employees have to say.
To begin, a company is nothing without its employees. It is formed by the small contributions of all of its employees. Hence, employees form the heart of the company and it's success largely depends on the people they've hired. From an employee's perspective, the place where they work becomes their second home as they spend almost 40 hours a week there. The major source of income comes from this place and hence employees are dependent on their company for everything. Therefore, it is obvious that employees will always have the company's best interests at heart because in a way they are also getting affected. For instance, if the company falls in a huge debt, the employees would be affected the most as many of them will be needed to resign and some might even get cuts from their salaries. And no one would want that to happen to themselves. Hence, employee's actions are mostly for the betterment of the company.
Secondly, after working at a place for 8 hours a day, everyday, you get to know the company inside out. It's functioning becomes more and more lucid to its employees and hence they have a first hand perspective about the working of the company. Moreover, all the employees have a different mindset and have different perspectives on any issue the company's facing. Therefore, the company should organize a few sessions or meetings and spend some time listening to what their employees have to say. Sometimes, consideration of an opposing view is also necessary to make the right choice. Hence, it is necessary that the employees views are taken into account for the welfare of the company.
Of course, some argue that consultants are the people who have good experience in this work and might have better suggestions to improve the efficiency of a firm. I agree that they are masters of their own work and are more acquainted with the rules and regulations on which a company works. They also have a set of protocols on which they work and might even have a set of predefined steps following which a company can improve their working substantially. But it's also true that the same solution does not really work for each company or in each scenario. Hence, it's better if a company, alongwith taking suggestions from outside consultants, pays more attention to its own employees and only after that make a decision. It cannot be denied that the employees will work for the betterment of their company.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-15 | Aishwarya01 | 54 | view |
| 2023-09-30 | Isolus | 66 | view |
| 2023-09-23 | bacec | 66 | view |
| 2023-09-18 | Adesina Boluwatito | 83 | view |
| 2023-09-09 | Theophilus Ebuka Odoh | 50 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 152, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'employees'' or 'employee's'?
Suggestion: employees'; employee's
...and perspective. Most of the time in an employees day is spent at their working place. It...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 213, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: they've
...s success largely depends on the people theyve hired. From an employees perspective, t...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 235, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'employees'' or 'employee's'?
Suggestion: employees'; employee's
...nds on the people theyve hired. From an employees perspective, the place where they work ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 55, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...r working at a place for 8 hours a day, everyday, you get to know the company inside out...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, moreover, really, second, secondly, so, therefore, for instance, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 54.0 33.0505617978 163% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 68.0 58.6224719101 116% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2510.0 2235.4752809 112% => OK
No of words: 522.0 442.535393258 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80842911877 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.77988695657 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63474251994 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 215.323595506 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.417624521073 0.4932671777 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 773.1 704.065955056 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 6.24550561798 208% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.2370786517 133% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.2651567646 60.3974514979 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.962962963 118.986275619 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3333333333 23.4991977007 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.81481481481 5.21951772744 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.83258426966 248% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.341975865218 0.243740707755 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101104340157 0.0831039109588 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0529501923005 0.0758088955206 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.235707787538 0.150359130593 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0188874919681 0.0667264976115 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 14.1392134831 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 12.1639044944 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.88 8.38706741573 82% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 100.480337079 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.