All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with these statements and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statements might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Companies can face a lot of different kinds of issues such as high employee turnover rates or disrupted work environment which could lead to the degradation of its overall performance. Further, the company can already be equipped with a lot of different tasks and may not be able to give more time to listening their employees. Therefore hiring an outside consultant can be considered as a better option to operate more efficiently. My views are supported with the below mentioned examples.
Firstly, hiring an outside consultant will be helpful to provide a unbiased opinion in matters of dispute or differences that exists while making any important company decision. For instance, consider a dispute amongst the employees and the HR department over the email inspection program introduced by the company. In this scenario, we cannot rely on the HR itself to resolve the issue. An outside consultant can weigh the opinions of both the parties and give unbiased advice to help resolve the matter.
In addition to this, an outside consultant is specialized in his work and may be able to handle various disparate situations that demand a strategic and logical solution. Therefore, they would be able to solve the different problems that arise in the company more efficiently that the company itself who might not be experienced enough to tackle certain situations that are different from the ones they normally encounter.
Finally, sometimes the employees won't be comfortable in sharing their views or thoughts to the co-workers and would find it easy to share with some unknown person. For instance, employees suffering from anxiety or depression can cause a futile and unproductive work environment. To prevent this, the company may hire an outside consultant so that the employee might be more comfortable to share
his personal experiences and get the required help to boost his productivity.
To sum up, in certain cases the company might not have enough budget or resources to acquire additional consultancy services but still, having any third party to use his/her own conscience to give the correct piece of advice or give the correct solution to any problem might always result into much better results than having the company itself to listen to their own employees.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-07-10 | shraddha456 | 50 | view |
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 329, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...more time to listening their employees. Therefore hiring an outside consultant can be con...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 66, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...e consultant will be helpful to provide a unbiased opinion in matters of dispute ...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, if, may, so, still, therefore, third, while, for instance, in addition, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 58.6224719101 89% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1930.0 2235.4752809 86% => OK
No of words: 370.0 442.535393258 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21621621622 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38581623665 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79801661988 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 215.323595506 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.537837837838 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 607.5 704.065955056 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 77.6407543414 60.3974514979 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.857142857 118.986275619 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4285714286 23.4991977007 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.57142857143 5.21951772744 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.3316334168 0.243740707755 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108123844007 0.0831039109588 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0733148609797 0.0758088955206 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155562200818 0.150359130593 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0839179725951 0.0667264976115 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 14.1392134831 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.1639044944 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 100.480337079 95% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 329, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...more time to listening their employees. Therefore hiring an outside consultant can be con...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 66, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...e consultant will be helpful to provide a unbiased opinion in matters of dispute ...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, if, may, so, still, therefore, third, while, for instance, in addition, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 58.6224719101 89% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1930.0 2235.4752809 86% => OK
No of words: 370.0 442.535393258 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21621621622 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38581623665 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79801661988 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 215.323595506 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.537837837838 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 607.5 704.065955056 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 77.6407543414 60.3974514979 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.857142857 118.986275619 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4285714286 23.4991977007 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.57142857143 5.21951772744 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.3316334168 0.243740707755 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108123844007 0.0831039109588 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0733148609797 0.0758088955206 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155562200818 0.150359130593 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0839179725951 0.0667264976115 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 14.1392134831 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.1639044944 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 100.480337079 95% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.