All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary.
Communication is the key ingredient for the success of any individual, relation or an organization. For the efficient operation of a company, they must communicate well within the company. Hiring a third-party to resolve or highlight key areas where the company can accelerate their efficiency and growth seems unreasonable when the solution can be found within. I would like to discuss the unwarranted importance given to consultants and the need to look within, by discussing few major points.
Firstly, a company that doesn't cater to its own people is working to its own debacle. For the efficient operation and growth that every company desires, lies in well treatment of its people. Companies need to create an environment of growth by providing opportunities to its employees to be open about their working environments, constraints, and possible betterments, all leading to the growth of the company. For example, HR department should reach out to its employees and discuss their needs, provide them with opportunities such as online courses where they can upskill themselves while team managers and leads can discuss the innovative ways their team wants to work with, that can result in a better project management and delivery. Employees should feel that the office is a place for their growth which makes them more efficient towards their work, and in the overall growth of company.
Moreover, according to research our happiness levels have a direct effect on the kind of work we do, and how productive we are. Companies who neglect their own people, their own employees by staying indifferent to their well-being often end up having lower growth rates, since the employees develop a rather negative mindset towards their own work and office. There also remains risk of employees going into depression due to lack of support, work stress and poor work culture which directly affects the performance of the employees and their contributions. Companies should not only focus on being customer-oriented but also employee-oriented, catering to its clients but also its own people.
Finally, the third-party consultants do the same thing, that is, provide solutions involving activities that help the companies employees be more efficient, such as team-building exercises, mental support, all of which could've been done by the company itself for the well-being of it's employees. These consultants may also rely on special software that review employee and work data for some AI-driven decision making, which again, can be done by the company by using such resources directly.
In conclusion, companies spend an excessive amount of money for consultants to suggest ways to operate efficiently, while ignoring the needs of its own employees, which results in wastage of their own employee talents and skills. These suggested ways can be developed or performed within the organization by simply doing an introspection of self, whether as an individual working for an organization or the organization itself, listening and tending to its peoples' needs.
- Many lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flu were routinely administered to all people in areas where the disease is detected However since there is a small possibility that a person will die as a result of the inoculations we cannot permit i 78
- An international development organization in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A While seeds for this new type of millet cost more farmers will be paid 54
- All too often companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees such consultants would be unnecessary 79
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 25, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ajor points. Firstly, a company that doesnt cater to its own people is working to i...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, if, look, may, moreover, so, third, well, while, for example, in conclusion, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 33.0505617978 127% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 62.0 58.6224719101 106% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2584.0 2235.4752809 116% => OK
No of words: 483.0 442.535393258 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34989648033 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68799114503 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99707730698 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 253.0 215.323595506 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52380952381 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 765.0 704.065955056 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 23.0359550562 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 70.0907962801 60.3974514979 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 152.0 118.986275619 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.4117647059 23.4991977007 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.58823529412 5.21951772744 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.369454434332 0.243740707755 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124718621926 0.0831039109588 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0770485659119 0.0758088955206 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.21430602355 0.150359130593 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0449163507041 0.0667264976115 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 14.1392134831 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 48.8420337079 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 12.1639044944 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.38706741573 111% => OK
difficult_words: 131.0 100.480337079 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 11.2143820225 118% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 79.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.