All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with these statements and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statements might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
For the crucial working of any company, it is necessary to have a well crafted plan with a focus on the long term achievements. Often advisers that do not belong to the company can aid in such tasks much better than any employee of that company.
External consultants often have years of experience in working with several organisations and institutions. They have built their reputation over time by augmenting several companies to their success. Due to their vast experience, such consultants give better advice than any company employee could possibly give. The employees of any company, though unduitably extremely talented, lack experience and might be myopic in their views. Hence, an external adviser would prove to be better.
Such consultants would give a holistic view of the situation in the economic world and would be able to predict the future of finance much better due to the immense amount of time spent in studying the market than any ordinary employee. An external consultant will also give unbiased opinion in a decision making task unlike the employees who might be predisposed to certain paradigms which may have been beneficial in the past but might not guarantee success in the future.
Although any external consultancy might charge huge sums of money in exchange for their services, they shall provide a broader picture of the market and efficiently suggest the long term goals any business must target in order to attain success. In such cases, any sum paid to such consultants might seem a nominal investment from the future perspective.
The above arguments suggest that an external consultancy is often a better adviser for a business due to the copious experience it has gained and its erudite professionals who have thoroughly studied the market and economy. Hence, hiring a consultant would be a beneficial decision for a company's future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-26 | Arpit Sahni | 58 | view |
| 2020-01-24 | shamitha | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-18 | JENIRSHAH | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-17 | caseya5 | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-14 | Siddiqur Rahman | 50 | view |
- Technology, while apparently aimed to simplify our lives, only makes our lives more complicated.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In dev 16
- The following is a memorandum from the business manager of a television station."Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news. During this period, most of the comp 55
- SuperCorp recently moved its headquarters to Corporateville. The recent surge in the number of homeowners in Corporateville proves that Corporateville is a superior place to live than Middlesburg, the home of SuperCorp's original headquarters. Moreov 63
- All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary.Write a response in which you discu 50
- Many lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flu were routinely administered to all people in areas where the disease is detected. However, since there is a small possibility that a person will die as a result of the inoculations, we cannot permi 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 294, Rule ID: MAY_COULD_POSSIBLY[1]
Message: Use simply 'could'.
Suggestion: could
...better advice than any company employee could possibly give. The employees of any company, tho...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, may, so, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 19.5258426966 41% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 33.0505617978 39% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 58.6224719101 67% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1578.0 2235.4752809 71% => OK
No of words: 306.0 442.535393258 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1568627451 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76335355297 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 215.323595506 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.522875816993 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 497.7 704.065955056 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.5271375414 60.3974514979 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.384615385 118.986275619 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5384615385 23.4991977007 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.38461538462 5.21951772744 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234705239024 0.243740707755 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101107739438 0.0831039109588 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0659533821089 0.0758088955206 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143878393314 0.150359130593 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.053385055659 0.0667264976115 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 14.1392134831 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.1639044944 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 100.480337079 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.