All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with these statements and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statements might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Consultants have become a very popular tool for outside organizations to turn when looking for ways to improve their organizations efficiency, employee satisfaction, and profits. In terms of efficiency, the belief that companies would be better off listening to their employees than outsourcing the issue to consultants is only true to a certain extent; to maximize effiecieny, companies should consult both outside agencies and the feedback from their own employees to develop newer and better solutions.
When it comes to larger companies especially, it becomes difficult for outside consultants to understand the tasks the employees of the company must undertake and the difficulties and issues that arise from them. For example, if an organization operates through an organized network of regions and districts, consultants cannot get an adequate idea of the issues hindering efficiency in the organization due to the fact that these issues may vary from one region to the next due to the quality and style of the management of each region; this makes it hard to discern whether an arising issue is due to poor management on behalf of the regional directors or the corporation itself and thus an appropriate solution is not likely to be discovered. In this case, along with many others, the corporation could send out a survey to employees in which the employees seperately evaluate the management quality of the corporate entity and that of the regional administration. This technique would clearly indicate what areas need to be improved and could suggest small but effective solutions to increase the efficiency of the corporation on a small and large scale.
Although employees are a valuable resource to consult, they alone cannot provide completely adequate solutions to the corporation's inefficiencies. The solutions employees may suggest will usuall be simple such as switching from one brand of product to another of higher quality in order to reduce long term costs and speed of operation, however their suggestions cannot cure the ailments of the issues of a corporate bureacracy. In this area consultants can help streamline certain business tasks and eliminate 'red tape'. Most employees are unaware of such issues as they either do not interact with this asepct of the organization or they simply do not have the professional insight to forsee problems and create solutions to fix them. Outside consultants can then help a corporation improve efficiency beyond the suggestions of its employees leading to a greater overall improvement.
To claim that the feedback of employees is of more value than the opinion of outside consultants, or vice versa, in terms of improving the efficiency of the corporation is not valid. Both employees and consultants play a curcial role in improving the efficiency of the organization and only when both roles are considered can a corporation obtain adequate solutions and achieve near-maximum efficiency.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-26 | Arpit Sahni | 58 | view |
| 2020-01-24 | shamitha | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-18 | JENIRSHAH | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-17 | caseya5 | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-14 | Siddiqur Rahman | 50 | view |
- Many lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flu were routinely administered to all people in areas where the disease is detected. However, since there is a small possibility that a person will die as a result of the inoculations, we cannot permi 50
- All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary.Write a response in which you discu 66
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, may, so, then, thus, for example, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 75.0 58.6224719101 128% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2497.0 2235.4752809 112% => OK
No of words: 468.0 442.535393258 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33547008547 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65116196802 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05857166902 2.79657885939 109% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 215.323595506 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.487179487179 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 787.5 704.065955056 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 36.0 23.0359550562 156% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 104.998055772 60.3974514979 174% => OK
Chars per sentence: 192.076923077 118.986275619 161% => OK
Words per sentence: 36.0 23.4991977007 153% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.21951772744 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194149088507 0.243740707755 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0779174485226 0.0831039109588 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0662401527862 0.0758088955206 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129544250821 0.150359130593 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0747471930434 0.0667264976115 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.7 14.1392134831 153% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 26.48 48.8420337079 54% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.92365168539 164% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.5 12.1743820225 152% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 12.1639044944 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.38706741573 112% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 100.480337079 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.8971910112 160% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.4 11.2143820225 146% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 11.7820224719 161% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.