Although innovations such as video, computers, and the Internet seem to offer schools improved methods for instructing students, these technologies all too often distract from real learning.
Innovation is the key of success and in 21st century, World has entered into new era of technologies. The technologies has drastically changed the methods of our daily doings and education is a part of it too. The education department have seen no real change from a very long time and almost following the same method of classrooms in every part of world. It needs to improvised to be on same page with other activities. So, Innovations, in this method, will definitely introduce a new culture that may prove helpful for future generation.
Every aspect or new thinking has its own consequences, so as the innovation of instructing methods in education. Distraction by introducing in teaching method may be a consequence, but the improved way will result better education quality than previous culture. Imagine a Lecturer teaching students in a class in US, parallelly, by 3D technology, students are acquiring the same knowledge in all parts of world. It can be recorded by camera and can be made available on Internet for future references. Notes on papers were the alternate in the past in comparison to it. So, the pros are more than the cons of this new method.
The world is growing and preparing for future by the help of new scientific research. Computers and technologies have become the most essential part of this growth. Now, if we look into schools, where our future generations are still getting education with archaic methods, they are going backward. In contrast to it, If the innovative methods related to technologies are introduced at the earlier stage to them, they will be more familiar and adaptable with the future upcoming. On a longer term, it will be helpful for them to cope up with the world, if they start hands on with computers from schools.
Although, the real learning, or the old methods of classroom are helpful for the students to grow and learn in a principled and disciplinary method, that is also an essential part of their life. The computer method will not make them understand about being mercurial. But, the discipline comes more from the parental side than the school and this factor will be more dependent upon the student himself. So, the distraction part provides less significance on this point than the profits of the new method adaption.
We need innovation in our education methods to burgeon. The technologies like computer and smart classes methods are helpful and will improvise the way of learning faster and sharper. There are consequences of this new technology but one has to take risk to get the successive results.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-17 | AC1990 | 62 | view |
| 2020-01-17 | AC1990 | 54 | view |
| 2019-12-25 | m_cobanera@yahoo.com.ar | 66 | view |
| 2019-12-17 | Isabella1027 | 75 | view |
| 2019-10-17 | mors | 50 | view |
- A nation should require all its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. 50
- Society should identify those children who have special talents and provide training for them at an early age to develop their talents. 41
- The greatness of individuals can be decided only by those who live after them, not by their contemporaries. 79
- Compare and contrast the way of your life with that of your parents. Which way of life do you think would be more satisfying for the next generations? 78
- The best way to solve environmental problems caused by consumer-generated waste is for towns and cities to impose strict limits on the amount of trash they will accept from each household. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 120, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'have', 'haven'.
Suggestion: have; haven
...w era of technologies. The technologies has drastically changed the methods of our ...
^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'if', 'look', 'may', 'so', 'still', 'as to', 'in contrast', 'in contrast to']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.241666666667 0.240241500013 101% => OK
Verbs: 0.1375 0.157235817809 87% => OK
Adjectives: 0.1 0.0880659088768 114% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0395833333333 0.0497285424764 80% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0416666666667 0.0444667217837 94% => OK
Prepositions: 0.139583333333 0.12292977631 114% => OK
Participles: 0.0416666666667 0.0406280797675 103% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.8400584662 2.79330140395 102% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0229166666667 0.030933414821 74% => OK
Particles: 0.00208333333333 0.0016655270985 125% => OK
Determiners: 0.108333333333 0.0997080785238 109% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0229166666667 0.0249443105267 92% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00625 0.0148568991511 42% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2583.0 2732.02544248 95% => OK
No of words: 435.0 452.878318584 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.93793103448 6.0361032391 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56690854021 4.58838876751 100% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.335632183908 0.366273622748 92% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.27816091954 0.280924506359 99% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.213793103448 0.200843997647 106% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.151724137931 0.132149295362 115% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8400584662 2.79330140395 102% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 219.290929204 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514942528736 0.48968727796 105% => OK
Word variations: 58.5974119266 55.4138127331 106% => OK
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6194690265 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.9130434783 23.380412469 81% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.054193184 59.4972553346 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.304347826 141.124799967 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9130434783 23.380412469 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.434782608696 0.674092028746 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.21349557522 19% => OK
Readability: 46.7291354323 51.4728631049 91% => OK
Elegance: 1.93333333333 1.64882698954 117% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257598469647 0.391690518653 66% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0997438567071 0.123202303941 81% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0792378482511 0.077325440228 102% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.503859075446 0.547984918172 92% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.137193996347 0.149214159877 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0942346150809 0.161403998019 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.047470164792 0.0892212321368 53% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.405893773518 0.385218514788 105% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0349094649051 0.0692045440612 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17433338562 0.275328986314 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0222825101757 0.0653680567796 34% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.4325221239 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.30420353982 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88274336283 205% => Less neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 12.0 7.22455752212 166% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 3.66592920354 27% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 8.0 2.70907079646 295% => OK
Total topic words: 21.0 13.5995575221 154% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.