Although innovations such as video, computers, and the Internet seem to offer schools improved methods for instructing students, these technologies all too often distract from real learning.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The statement mentions that technology like internet and videos can distract students from learning which is not true most of the times because every student has a choice to use it for learning or for entertainment. It is an easy way for schools to have regulation programs to control the technology distraction.
First of all, we definitely cannot ignore the numerous positive learning consequences by using technology. Imagine a country, Iran, where there was not internet to help students to understand textbook contents better. Consider how much easier it could be for students to study with innovations like teaching websites and not just textbooks. It is obvious that technology can bring an opportunity for teachers to teach their concepts better and deeper to students.
Additionally, depending on the concept everybody can study better and faster by using different modernization methods. It is easier for some students to understand textbooks’ concepts by reading different articles, research papers, online books, and online flash cards. However, some students are more comfortable to learn with watching videos and movies, and seeing pictures. No matter what is the teaching concept and how students are able to learn, innovations like Internet and computes have brought a lot of ways for teachers to teach more efficient and for students to learn deeper.
On the contrary, some teachers and parents believe that unlimited use of Internet is not good because it can be a distraction in schools. Obviously, students who spend a lot of their time playing video games, checking their Facebook, and chatting online cannot focus on their studying; however, we cannot blame the technology. There are always two sides of technology which can be positive or negative. Students who choose to use those technologies for studying purpose are able to learn. On the other hand, students who use an internet for entertainment can slow down their learning time. In addition, schools can easily install especial programs to filter video games, websites, and Facebook.
Students should use innovations like Internet and videos which can definitely improve and bring unlimited teaching and learning techniques. It is obvious that students can get extra help from different online websites to learn deeper. In case of distraction, schools can have regulation programs to guide and monitor students.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-28 | qsdzlbnwtpzecdeugi | 33 | view |
| 2024-02-19 | Zahid6400 | 75 | view |
| 2024-01-19 | rimpiG | 54 | view |
| 2023-11-09 | Feiyang Wang | 79 | view |
| 2023-08-05 | weonalaz | 58 | view |
- Some people believe that our ever increasing use of technology significantly reduces our opportunities for human interaction Other people believe that technology provides us with new and better ways to communicate and connect with one another Write a resp 62
- The following appeared in a letter to the editor of a local newspaper Commuters complain that increased rush hour traffic on Blue Highway between the suburbs and the city center has doubled their commuting time The favored proposal of the motorists lobby 58
- Competition for high grades seriously limits the quality of learning at all levels of education Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In deve 58
- Governments should offer college and university education free of charge to all students Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In develo 50
- Governments should place few if any restrictions on scientific research and development Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In develop 50
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, so, in addition, first of all, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 33.0505617978 57% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 58.6224719101 75% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2022.0 2235.4752809 90% => OK
No of words: 376.0 442.535393258 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37765957447 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40348946061 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82195264035 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 215.323595506 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.478723404255 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 613.8 704.065955056 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.5175896177 60.3974514979 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.421052632 118.986275619 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7894736842 23.4991977007 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.47368421053 5.21951772744 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231704986688 0.243740707755 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0833500696435 0.0831039109588 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0620958812628 0.0758088955206 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161383891824 0.150359130593 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0521911696323 0.0667264976115 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.1639044944 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 100.480337079 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.