Essay 3: Although innovations such as video, computers, and the Internet seem to offer schools improved methods for instructing students, these technologies all too often distract from real learning.
The advent of digital technologies has undeniably transformed various facets of human life, and education is no exception. While proponents argue that these innovations offer unprecedented opportunities for enhanced learning, a countervailing perspective posits that such technologies often serve as distractions rather than catalysts for genuine intellectual growth.
Undeniably, technology can be a powerful tool for augmenting instruction. Interactive multimedia platforms can engage students in ways traditional methods cannot, while online resources provide access to a vast repository of knowledge. Moreover, technology can facilitate personalized learning, allowing students to progress at their own pace and focus on areas of particular interest.
However, the allure of digital devices can also be a significant impediment to focused learning. The constant stream of notifications, social media updates, and online games can fragment attention and hinder deep cognitive engagement. Furthermore, excessive reliance on technology can diminish critical thinking and problem-solving skills, as students may become overly dependent on search engines and automated tools.
To maximize the benefits of technology while mitigating its drawbacks, a balanced approach is essential. Integrating technology thoughtfully into the curriculum, rather than simply replacing traditional methods, is crucial. Additionally, fostering digital literacy and teaching students how to use technology effectively and responsibly is paramount. Ultimately, the success of technology in education depends on how it is employed; when used judiciously as a complement to, rather than a substitute for, traditional teaching methods, it can be a valuable asset in the learning process.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-28 | qsdzlbnwtpzecdeugi | 33 | view |
| 2024-02-19 | Zahid6400 | 75 | view |
| 2024-01-19 | rimpiG | 54 | view |
| 2023-11-09 | Feiyang Wang | 79 | view |
| 2023-08-05 | weonalaz | 58 | view |
- Society should identify those children who have special talents and provide training for them at an early age to develop their talents 70
- In order for any work of art for example a film a novel a poem or a song to have merit it must be understandable to most people 58
- Essay 3 Although innovations such as video computers and the Internet seem to offer schools improved methods for instructing students these technologies all too often distract from real learning 33
- Society should identify those children who have special talents and provide training for them at an early age to develop their talents 62
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 19.5258426966 41% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.3162921348 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 33.0505617978 21% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 58.6224719101 39% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1530.0 2235.4752809 68% => OK
No of words: 242.0 442.535393258 55% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.32231404959 5.05705443957 125% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94415379849 4.55969084622 87% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.41605349601 2.79657885939 122% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 215.323595506 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.669421487603 0.4932671777 136% => OK
syllable_count: 486.9 704.065955056 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 2.0 1.59117977528 126% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.2370786517 59% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.4650594196 60.3974514979 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.5 118.986275619 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1666666667 23.4991977007 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 5.21951772744 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163356469198 0.243740707755 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0555079962144 0.0831039109588 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0529526233573 0.0758088955206 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0999127551484 0.150359130593 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0579885794251 0.0667264976115 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.4 14.1392134831 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 17.34 48.8420337079 36% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.92365168539 164% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 12.1743820225 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 19.38 12.1639044944 159% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.81 8.38706741573 141% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 100.480337079 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 33.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 19.5258426966 41% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.3162921348 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 33.0505617978 21% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 58.6224719101 39% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1530.0 2235.4752809 68% => OK
No of words: 242.0 442.535393258 55% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.32231404959 5.05705443957 125% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94415379849 4.55969084622 87% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.41605349601 2.79657885939 122% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 215.323595506 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.669421487603 0.4932671777 136% => OK
syllable_count: 486.9 704.065955056 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 2.0 1.59117977528 126% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.2370786517 59% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.4650594196 60.3974514979 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.5 118.986275619 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1666666667 23.4991977007 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 5.21951772744 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163356469198 0.243740707755 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0555079962144 0.0831039109588 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0529526233573 0.0758088955206 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0999127551484 0.150359130593 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0579885794251 0.0667264976115 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.4 14.1392134831 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 17.34 48.8420337079 36% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.92365168539 164% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 12.1743820225 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 19.38 12.1639044944 159% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.81 8.38706741573 141% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 100.480337079 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 33.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.