Although innovations such as video, computers, and the Internet seem to offer schools improved methods for instructing students, these technologies all too often distract from real learning.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The statement mentions that technology like internet and videos can distract students from learning. Every student has a choice to use it for learning or for entertainment. It is an easy way for schools to have regulation programs to control the technology distraction.
First of all, we definitely cannot ignore the numerous positive learning consequences by using technology. Imagine a country, Iran, where there was not internet to help students to understand textbook contents better. Consider how much easier it could be for students to study with innovations like teaching websites and not just textbooks. It is obvious that technology can bring an opportunity for teachers to teach their concepts better and deeper to students.
Additionally, depending on the concept everybody can study better and faster by using different modernization methods. For example, it is easier for some students to understand textbooks’ concepts by reading different articles, research papers, online books, and online flash cards. However, some students are more comfortable to learn with watching videos and movies, and seeing pictures. No matter what is the teaching concept and how students are able to learn, innovations like Internet and computes have brought a lot of ways for teachers to teach more efficient and for students to learn deeper.
On the contrary, some teachers and parents believe that unlimited use of Internet can be a distraction in schools which can be true. Obviously, students who spend a lot of their time playing video games, checking their Facebook, and chatting online cannot focus on their studying; however, we cannot blame the technology. There are always two sides of technology which can be positive or negative. Students who choose to use those technologies for studying purpose are able to learn. On the other hand, students who use an internet for entertainment can slow down their learning time. In addition, schools can easily install especial programs to filter video games, websites, and Facebook.
Students should use innovations like Internet and videos which can definitely improve and bring unlimited teaching and learning techniques. It is obvious that students can get extra help from different online websites to learn deeper. In case of distraction, schools can have regulation programs to guide and monitor students.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-28 | qsdzlbnwtpzecdeugi | 33 | view |
| 2024-02-19 | Zahid6400 | 75 | view |
| 2024-01-19 | rimpiG | 54 | view |
| 2023-11-09 | Feiyang Wang | 79 | view |
| 2023-08-05 | weonalaz | 58 | view |
- The general welfare of a nation s people is a better indication of that nation s greatness than are the achievements of its rulers artists or scientists Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In deve 50
- Educational institutions should actively encourage their students to choose fields of study that will prepare them for lucrative careers Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and suppo 58
- The following appeared as a recommendation by a committee planning a ten year budget for the city of Calatrava The birthrate in our city is declining in fact last year s birthrate was only one half that of five years ago Thus the number of students enroll 68
- Young people should be encouraged to pursue long term realistic goals rather than seek immediate fame and recognition Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for th 50
- Some people believe that our ever increasing use of technology significantly reduces our opportunities for human interaction Other people believe that technology provides us with new and better ways to communicate and connect with one another Write a resp 50
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, so, for example, in addition, first of all, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.6327345309 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.9520958084 124% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 11.1786427146 170% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 13.6137724551 81% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 28.8173652695 62% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 55.5748502994 77% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 16.3942115768 61% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1995.0 2260.96107784 88% => OK
No of words: 368.0 441.139720559 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42119565217 5.12650576532 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37987740619 4.56307096286 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83240175551 2.78398813304 102% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 204.123752495 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.48097826087 0.468620217663 103% => OK
syllable_count: 603.9 705.55239521 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.96107784431 121% => OK
Article: 1.0 8.76447105788 11% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.70958083832 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.67365269461 239% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.22255489022 95% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 19.7664670659 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.8473053892 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.019815819 57.8364921388 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.75 119.503703932 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4 23.324526521 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.9 5.70786347227 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.25449101796 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 8.20758483034 207% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 6.88822355289 29% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.67664670659 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231864693386 0.218282227539 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0856101297957 0.0743258471296 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0511594365525 0.0701772020484 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158151700313 0.128457276422 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0373337120306 0.0628817314937 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 14.3799401198 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.3550499002 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.197005988 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.5979740519 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.32208582834 102% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 98.500998004 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 12.3882235529 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.1389221557 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.9071856287 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.