Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader, it is not as important as a leader’s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers. Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
I don't entirely agree with the premise that it is much more important for a leader to maintain the respect of his or her peers rather than having a sound moral judgement.
A leader is someone on whom the entire team depends for the final call of judgment. There may be varying opinions within a group, but the whole enterprise relies on the leader's ability to chaff through all opinions and reach a critical decision. If his ability is somewhat lacking or is overshadowed by the need to maintain respect and veneration for all, there may be adverse consequences the team will have to face as a result of the leader's actions.
Also, the primary aim of the leader should be to guide the group effort to the optimal state. For this, it is important to adhere to a certain code of principles and ethics. Not everyone within the group may think from the same perspective. It becomes fundamental for a leader to be able to choose the correct path from among various opinions and factions that have different ideals and morals. For the betterment of the group and the ultimate goal of completing a task effectively and efficiently, it might be necessary to take a harsh tone with insubordinate members of the group.
However, it should be mentioned here that for a leader to be respected and be someone on whom the group can have unequivocal faith, it is important that there be mutual respect from both ends. A leader who is very haughty and inconsiderate of his subordinates will not be very liked among his group, and the chances of disagreements and misunderstandings might increase in such cases. It is crucial to be able to impart respect to those who are of a differing mindset so that robust decision-making may take place for important causes.
To conclude, it can be said that although it is fundamental that a leader has the sound moral judgment required to make the correct decisions for the group, it is important that he be humble and maintain the respect of his or her peers, especially when disagreeing with their thoughts and ideas.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-30 | rahatumar9072 | 50 | view |
| 2024-03-30 | rahatumar9072 | 50 | view |
| 2023-10-30 | qwertyy | 54 | view |
| 2023-09-24 | Adelaida | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-18 | Mayuresh08 | 50 | view |
- Discussing controversial topics with those with contrasting views is not useful because very few people change their mind when questioned about their core beliefs Write a response to the prompt in which you discuss whether or not you agree or disagree Be 50
- Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader it is not as important as a leader s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree wi 54
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be sure to 50
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be sure to 50
- Society should identify those children who have special talents and provide training for them at an early age to develop their talents Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 3, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
I dont entirely agree with the premise that it...
^^^^
Line 3, column 170, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'leaders'' or 'leader's'?
Suggestion: leaders'; leader's
... but the whole enterprise relies on the leaders ability to chaff through all opinions a...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 58.6224719101 75% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1696.0 2235.4752809 76% => OK
No of words: 359.0 442.535393258 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.72423398329 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35284910392 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78783747218 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 215.323595506 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.484679665738 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 531.9 704.065955056 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.3286808972 60.3974514979 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.461538462 118.986275619 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.6153846154 23.4991977007 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.38461538462 5.21951772744 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210593376062 0.243740707755 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0875940605173 0.0831039109588 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0743215260325 0.0758088955206 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160137410795 0.150359130593 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0759981907816 0.0667264976115 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 14.1392134831 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 48.8420337079 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 12.1743820225 103% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 12.1639044944 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 100.480337079 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.