Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader, it is not as important as a leader’s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
A leader is like the engine of a car. He/she is the one responsible for finalizing and taking major decisions in order to fulfil the objectives of the firm. Concomitantly, he/she is also responsible for the well-being, status and progess of his/her peers. Although respect is the prime element that every individual must get, it is very important to make a moral judgement for the well being of the clients and society.
Firstly, one will always fail to make a cogent argument if not morally sound. A moral judgement refers to contemplate all the advantages, disadvantages, environmental factors, social status and equality, religious sentiments, progress and must be in accordance with the law. For instance, a leader cannot assert his protection or be a mendicant if his/her peer is found to be guilty of any crime, theft or irresponsible behaviour.
Moreover, if a leader allows and supports the flaws and immoral acts of his/her patrons, they will get motivated and instead commit more depraved acts. A leader should have a sound moral judgement and good communication and limning skills in order to explicate and convince his peers and friends of their wrongdoings and the ways to correct them and follow the right path. A stellar example would be of a government political party leader who finds that one of his colleagues is laundering money. Instead of defending him; defaming, rebuking, pillaging him in front of the entire party, the leader must talk to him in person putting out the facts, correction measures and future course of action. If the peer is still not ready to follow, the leader must take a strict or legal action against his swindler peer.
Additionally, all individuals in this world should get as well as give veneration to their fellows. It is a basic ettiquette that must be inculcated in all the individuals since birth. Respecting other people won't harm a person's standing or make him/her appear to be inferior to the person they are respecting. Also, you will get recognition, your peers will agree to your opinions and see you as a 'down to earth' person. A leader must point out the flaws and errors of his peers in a reverential and euphemistic way.
To sum, a leader must not forget to be deferential to his peers at all times but must also possess a sound moral judgement, stand up and fight for the truth, have convincing, communication and expounding skills.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-30 | rahatumar9072 | 50 | view |
| 2024-03-30 | rahatumar9072 | 50 | view |
| 2023-10-30 | qwertyy | 54 | view |
| 2023-09-24 | Adelaida | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-18 | Mayuresh08 | 50 | view |
- Children over the age of 15 should be allowed to vote 73
- The following is a memorandum from the business manager of a television station Over the past year our late night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news During this period most of the complaints re 58
- The luxuries and conveniences of contemporary life prevent people from developing into truly strong and independent individuals 83
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Children over the age of 15 should be allowed to vote Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- Some people suggest that it is wrong to give money to beggars asking for money on the street while others think that it is the right thing to do Which point of view do you think is correct and why 90
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, moreover, so, still, well, for instance, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 25.0 14.8657303371 168% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 58.6224719101 78% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2003.0 2235.4752809 90% => OK
No of words: 407.0 442.535393258 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92137592138 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49157444576 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84482265799 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 215.323595506 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538083538084 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 609.3 704.065955056 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.1978871372 60.3974514979 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.277777778 118.986275619 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6111111111 23.4991977007 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.55555555556 5.21951772744 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215280369436 0.243740707755 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0693098450109 0.0831039109588 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0403161189319 0.0758088955206 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121790638935 0.150359130593 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0199301478953 0.0667264976115 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 14.1392134831 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.8420337079 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 100.480337079 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.