Sound moral judgment and the ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers are equally important for a leader.
The leader's ability to maintain the respect of his peers is a direct result of his moral compass. His calm and calculated attitude towards dealing with success and failure, his man-management skills are fundamentally based on his moral principles. Inorder to earn the respect of the team, the leader has to take some tough decisions; all these have a direct bearing on his or her peers. When this decision is taken without any form of impartiality, the leader's respect grows in the team. Hence, sound moral judgment of a leader is as important as the ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers.
When acts are based on a sound moral compass, the individual who takes the final call does not feel about the the iffs and buts of the decision. For example, In team sports like cricket, where the leader has to take some tough tactical decisions based on the prevailing circumstances. The result of such decisions do not clog the leader's mind if it was completely decided according to his moral principles. One bad decision may not make you a loser. But a series of bad decisions will lead you to failure. Ofcourse the team atmosphere is much better during times of victory than of losses. A better atmosphere means there is much better respect and coordination among the team.
Sometimes there might be the one odd instance where the leader feels one option is morally right, but taking a different route will be better for the end - result. An example for this can be seen in the the Indian epic Mahabharat, where Lord krishna has to resort to indirect means to kill the kauravas. Here the ends justify the means. Eventhough some decisions where not supported my a sound moral compass, it was for the greater good. The whole has respected that decision taken by Lord Krishna.
Finally, Sound moral judgement is a cause for the leader to be well respected by his fellow team-mates. Hence both qualities are equally important for a leader.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 5, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'leaders'' or 'leader's'?
Suggestion: leaders'; leader's
... equally important for a leader. The leaders ability to maintain the respect of his ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 107, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...akes the final call does not feel about the the iffs and buts of the decision. For exam...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 107, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...akes the final call does not feel about the the iffs and buts of the decision. For exam...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 200, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...ult. An example for this can be seen in the the Indian epic Mahabharat, where Lord kris...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 200, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...ult. An example for this can be seen in the the Indian epic Mahabharat, where Lord kris...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 105, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...ell respected by his fellow team-mates. Hence both qualities are equally important fo...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, hence, if, may, so, well, as for, as to, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 58.6224719101 67% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1716.0 2235.4752809 77% => OK
No of words: 360.0 442.535393258 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76666666667 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56293920961 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 215.323595506 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.486111111111 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 532.8 704.065955056 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.1906910396 60.3974514979 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.8 118.986275619 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 23.4991977007 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.3 5.21951772744 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.398763294781 0.243740707755 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.137663841989 0.0831039109588 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.172636540029 0.0758088955206 228% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.296450816798 0.150359130593 197% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.195505172562 0.0667264976115 293% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 14.1392134831 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 48.8420337079 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.09 12.1639044944 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.51 8.38706741573 90% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 100.480337079 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.