In any field of endeavor, it is impossible to make a significant contribution without first being strongly influenced by past achievements within that field.
The statements argues that if a person do not have any past experience or achievement within that field in past, then he will not able make a significant contribution in that field. Many of us will argue that this will hold all the time, while others will counter this. In essay, I will highlight both the side of the statement and will provide sound reasoning for the same.
It is true that if you have experience in a certain field than your chance make a significant contribution in that field will be high, for example, throughout history, we have witnessed many of the known leaders, entrepreneurs and contributing figures who have experienced multiple failures and had consecutive misfortunes. However, those people never gave up, because their ambition and will to make a change was greater than the immediate personal gratification. If their great contribution was due to their previous achievements, we would not have the chance to know them or be influenced by them.
Furthermore, previous achievement do play a significant role in one success, but that does not mean that if you have no experience in that field you would not make it in that field. We have several example, for example, NASA able to succeed in their first attempt to successfully land on moon, ISRO was successful in their first attempt of Mars Orbiter Mission. So, by saying that it impossible does not make any sense to us, we have numerous other example of getting success in their first attempt without having prior experience. Past achievement can provide you more confidence and strength to you but won't be enough to make you success, like many countries such as Japan, tried many times to reach to Mars but failed on the other hand India make it in their first attempt.
Last but on the least, be a successful or make a significant contribution can be different from person to person, organization to organization or mission to mission, for example, if army is doing search operation and if a local men provide them a great lead by providing information about their target and then according to me he made a significant contribution in the mission or we can say way more contribution than many other people involve in the mission. But we won't heard his name in any news or in any document. So we should first understand and evaluate the meaning of ‘significant achievement'.
In nutshell, as mentioned above past achievement is just a one factor like many other, it can provide you support and gives strength, but we have several example, where people or an organization succeed in their first attempt.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-16 | HAN YEBIN | 50 | view |
| 2024-04-02 | guozhishan | 50 | view |
| 2023-09-01 | Sovendo Talapatra | 50 | view |
| 2023-07-18 | Jonginn | 83 | view |
| 2022-11-04 | raghavchauhan619 | 83 | view |
- The well being of a society is enhanced when many of its people question authority 66
- Scientists and other researchers should focus their research on areas that are likely to benefit the greatest number of people 66
- Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts 50
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed 50
- In any field of endeavor it is impossible to make a significant contribution without first being strongly influenced by past achievements within that field 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 16, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'argue'.
Suggestion: argue
The statements argues that if a person do not have any past e...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 56, Rule ID: PAST_EXPERIENCE_MEMORY[1]
Message: Use simply 'experience'.
Suggestion: experience
...argues that if a person do not have any past experience or achievement within that field in pa...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 93, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ny past experience or achievement within that field in past, then he will not abl...
^^
Line 1, column 106, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the past'?
Suggestion: in the past
...ience or achievement within that field in past, then he will not able make a significa...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 191, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun example seems to be countable; consider using: 'several examples'.
Suggestion: several examples
...ould not make it in that field. We have several example, for example, NASA able to succeed in t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 229, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'man'?
Suggestion: man
...s doing search operation and if a local men provide them a great lead by providing ...
^^^
Line 9, column 118, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ny other, it can provide you support and gives strength, but we have several exam...
^^
Line 9, column 148, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun example seems to be countable; consider using: 'several examples'.
Suggestion: several examples
...upport and gives strength, but we have several example, where people or an organization succee...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ation succeed in their first attempt.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, so, then, while, for example, such as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 14.8657303371 148% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 54.0 33.0505617978 163% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 58.6224719101 97% => OK
Nominalization: 25.0 12.9106741573 194% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2164.0 2235.4752809 97% => OK
No of words: 443.0 442.535393258 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8848758465 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58776254615 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87158204114 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 215.323595506 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.467268623025 0.4932671777 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 672.3 704.065955056 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 23.0359550562 135% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 102.288233209 60.3974514979 169% => OK
Chars per sentence: 154.571428571 118.986275619 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.6428571429 23.4991977007 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.57142857143 5.21951772744 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 7.80617977528 115% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.299724171915 0.243740707755 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112952007425 0.0831039109588 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102712039748 0.0758088955206 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162284013415 0.150359130593 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0493557525288 0.0667264976115 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 14.1392134831 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.47 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.62 12.1639044944 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 100.480337079 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 11.2143820225 128% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.