In any field of endeavor, it is impossible to make a significant contribution without first being strongly influenced by past achievements within that field.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The statement claims that it is impossible to achieve some contribution without regarding the past achievements which concern these field. Although this sounds a little bit extreme at a first glance, its describes exactly the way that the things evolves in the world.
In the first place, everything that is created come from somewhere, without exception. For example, when we think in a discovery very primitive, the first thought that come in mind is the creation/discovery of fire by our ancestors. Even, these primitive people haven’t discovered anything close to fire before that event, they are influenced by natural events which could be occurred, like an lightning who puts fire in a tree, and then they firstly saw that this strange hot event could be useful for cooking or hunting, giving a strong motif to these people to try to reproduce that element.
Moreover, in more moderns times, we can take the example of the “space race” during the cold war. The Apollo 11 was far from being the first spaceship ever made and tested. There were numerous project that preceded the greatest achievement of the first man on the Moon. Every tests contributed for creating small pieces of data that after a long time could be agglutinate into a very big knowledge used by the last missions. It is also important to say that these achievements are timeless, even the most ancient discoveries and data are being used nowadays. As Elon Musk one time said, the first books that he started to read in the beginning of SpaceX were very old engineering books, like “Structures: Or Why Things Don't Fall Down” written in the 1960s.
Furthermore, we can apply this concept to the way which the contemporary society works. The history of the mankind is largely used to help the development of world nations. In almost the entire world that is used, since the ancient greek times, the concept of democracy. Also the basis of the constitution and fundamental laws come from this epoch. Showing that without thinking every around us are influenced by past, and seldom very old, achievements which were proved to be useful.
In that words, we can acknowledge that with no past achievements it is impossible to make significant contribution in our society, and that work with all fields of endeavor. Since technology to laws, everything have your background based on previous events.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-07 | luckystar1941 | 54 | view |
| 2019-05-07 | luckystar1941 | 62 | view |
- Communal online encyclopedias represent one of the latest resources to be found on the Internet. They are in many respects like traditional printed encyclopedias collections of articles on various subjects. What is specific to these online encyclopedias, 80
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position 83
- The following appeared in a letter to the editor of the Balmer Island Gazette."On Balmer Island, where mopeds serve as a popular form of transportation, the population increases to 100,000 during the summer months. To reduce the number of accidents involv 29
- Is it more important to be able to work with a group of people on a team or to work independently? Use reasons and specific examples to support your answer. 70
- Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position 41
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 163, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...ern these field. Although this sounds a little bit extreme at a first glance, its describe...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 396, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...al events which could be occurred, like an lightning who puts fire in a tree, and ...
^^
Line 3, column 280, Rule ID: EACH_EVERY_NNS[1]
Message: 'Each' and 'every' are used with singular. Did you mean 'all'?
Suggestion: All
...hievement of the first man on the Moon. Every tests contributed for creating small pi...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 734, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: Don't
...s, like 'Structures: Or Why Things Dont Fall Down' written in the 1960s. ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 271, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
... greek times, the concept of democracy. Also the basis of the constitution and funda...
^^^^
Line 5, column 179, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... work with all fields of endeavor. Since technology to laws, everything have your...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, moreover, regarding, so, then, for example, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 22.0 11.3162921348 194% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 33.0505617978 118% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 58.6224719101 106% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1998.0 2235.4752809 89% => OK
No of words: 398.0 442.535393258 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02010050251 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46653527281 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81952987991 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 215.323595506 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577889447236 0.4932671777 117% => OK
syllable_count: 617.4 704.065955056 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.38483146067 228% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.1067189512 60.3974514979 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.0 118.986275619 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1111111111 23.4991977007 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.88888888889 5.21951772744 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236830292699 0.243740707755 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0687486788709 0.0831039109588 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0920195908222 0.0758088955206 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143126914879 0.150359130593 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0644094965657 0.0667264976115 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 14.1392134831 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.1639044944 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 100.480337079 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.