According to the statement, it is beyond the bounds of possibility to achieve some contribution without regarding the past achievements which concern these fields. Although this statement sounds a little bit extreme at a first glance, I believe that it describes exactly the way that the things evolves in the world.
On the one hand, everything is created come from somewhere, without exception. For example, when we think in a discovery very primitive, the first thought that come in mind is the creation of fire by our ancestors. Even, these primitive people haven't discovered anything close to fire before that event , they are influenced by natural events which could be occurred, like an lightning which puts fire in a tree, and then they firstly saw that this strange hot event could be useful for cooking or hunting, giving a strong motivation to these people to try to reproduce that element.
On the other hand, in more moderns times, some field have just been thought only revealed in nearly 70 years ago and before that no one thinks or imagines about that some day we have ability to fly to universe and discover another planet. However, in fact that there were numerous project that preceded the greatest achievement of the first spaceship ever made or the first man on the Moon. Every tests contributed for creating small pieces of data that after a long time could be agglutinate into a very big knowledge used by the last missions. It is also significant to say that these achievements are timeless, even the most ancient discoveries and data are being used nowadays. As Elson Musk one time said, the first books that he started to read in the beginning of SpaceX were very old engineering books, like " Structure: Or Why things don't Fall Down" written in the 1960s.
Furthermore, we can apply this concept to the way which the contemporary society works. The history of mankind is largely used to help the development of world civilization. In almost the entire world that is used , since the ancient Greek times, the concept of democracy. Also the basis of the constitution and fundamental laws come from this epoch. These evidences have proven that every around us on these day are influenced by past and these old achievements which were proven evidently to be useful.
In conclusion, we can acknowledge that with no past achievements it is impossible to make great contribution in our society, and that work with all fields of endeavor. Since technology to laws, everything have your background based on the previous events.
- Studying foodways – what foods people eat and how they produce ,acquire,prepare,and consume them-is the best way to gain deep understanding of a culture. 62
- To be an effective leader, a public official must maintain the highest ethical and moral standards.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to addre 50
- In any field of endeavor, it is impossible to make a significant contribution without first being strongly influenced by past achievements within that field.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement 54
- 138. Some people believe that competition for high grades motivates students to excel in the classroom. Others believe that such competition seriously limits the quality of real learning. 事实Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely 83
- To understand the most important characteristics of a society, one must study its major cities.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In deve 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 198, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...ields. Although this statement sounds a little bit extreme at a first glance, I believe th...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 244, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: haven't
...ancestors. Even, these primitive people havent discovered anything close to fire befor...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 302, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...anything close to fire before that event , they are influenced by natural events w...
^^
Line 3, column 372, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ral events which could be occurred, like an lightning which puts fire in a tree, ...
^^
Line 3, column 374, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...l events which could be occurred, like an lightning which puts fire in a tree, an...
^^
Line 4, column 391, Rule ID: EACH_EVERY_NNS[1]
Message: 'Each' and 'every' are used with singular. Did you mean 'all'?
Suggestion: All
...ever made or the first man on the Moon. Every tests contributed for creating small pi...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 848, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...s, like ' Structure: Or Why things dont Fall Down' written in the 1960s. ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 213, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... In almost the entire world that is used , since the ancient Greek times, the conc...
^^
Line 5, column 273, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
... Greek times, the concept of democracy. Also the basis of the constitution and funda...
^^^^
Line 5, column 403, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this day' or 'these days'?
Suggestion: this day; these days
...ces have proven that every around us on these day are influenced by past and these old ac...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, regarding, so, then, for example, in conclusion, in fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 23.0 11.3162921348 203% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 44.0 33.0505617978 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 69.0 58.6224719101 118% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2132.0 2235.4752809 95% => OK
No of words: 431.0 442.535393258 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94663573086 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55637350225 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6921849629 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 240.0 215.323595506 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556844547564 0.4932671777 113% => OK
syllable_count: 671.4 704.065955056 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 4.38483146067 274% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.8673403677 60.3974514979 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.411764706 118.986275619 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3529411765 23.4991977007 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.52941176471 5.21951772744 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 7.80617977528 128% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221477333278 0.243740707755 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0608351823135 0.0831039109588 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0674645781959 0.0758088955206 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12757635841 0.150359130593 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0424601752907 0.0667264976115 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 14.1392134831 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 12.1639044944 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 100.480337079 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.