In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
In any field of study, work or research, there are bouts of people who go in with expectations to make an impact one way or the other. After years of learning, making mistakes, success stories and even failures, they are eventually recognized as influential people or an expert in the field. Can a beginner in a certain field or work or research make important contributions compared to another veteran in that field? Though this is proposed, I defer based on the following reasons.
Firstly, to become an expert in any field, first step is to learn its basics. A research student who is interested in advancement of the renewable energy sector will first have to learn about various renewable energy sources and narrow down what his/her concentration will be on. This learning is very vast and takes a while over which this student may then be regarded as an expert and no longer a beginner.
Also, being able to add relevance to any field requires trying different experiments, hypothesis to figure out which is valid and can be implemented on a large scale. Allowing a neophyte to go to the laboratory, without any guide or instructions except the intuition that he/she will make good of the time there is more risky and dangerous. In the oil fields, beginners are given a green hard hat so they can be easily spotted from any distance. People are more cautious and supervise them more as they are prone to mistakes due to their limited years of experience. After spending reasonable time on the field, and proving that they can work independently and safely, they can then be given the white “expert color” hard hats.
On the other hand, there is the possibility of having beginner’s luck. For instance, the stock market is a field that is somewhat dependent on the economy and luck. A trader on the first day of the job can make millions from one sale due to a transaction executed at the right time compared to another experienced trader who perhaps waited a tad longer to execute similar trade. However, this is rarely the case. There is usually some form of learning in every sector including finance to be able to make meaningful contributions.
In conclusion, except for one having beginner’s luck, experts are more likely that beginners to excel in any given field and make important contributions. This is because experts have better know-how of the system and understand different fundamentals necessary to excel in related tasks.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-19 | Marqueetim | 43 | view |
| 2023-09-25 | Dipesh1234 | 66 | view |
| 2023-09-19 | nigarsafarova | 75 | view |
| 2023-09-18 | Bidusik47 | 50 | view |
| 2023-09-01 | Sophy@ | 50 | view |
- The following is a memorandum from the business manager of a television station Over the past year our late night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news During this period most of the complaints re 68
- In any field of inquiry the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In 66
- The luxuries and conveniences of contemporary life prevent people from developing into truly strong and independent individuals Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning f 70
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporting you 62
- Summarize the points made in the lecture you just heard explaining how they cast doubt on points made in the passage 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 496, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[1]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...e more cautious and supervise them more as they are prone to mistakes due to their...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, so, then, while, except for, for instance, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 58.6224719101 104% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2048.0 2235.4752809 92% => OK
No of words: 418.0 442.535393258 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8995215311 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52162009685 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76313200344 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 215.323595506 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.516746411483 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 654.3 704.065955056 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.7685977821 60.3974514979 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.789473684 118.986275619 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 23.4991977007 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.31578947368 5.21951772744 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18539519635 0.243740707755 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0590790402561 0.0831039109588 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0548575422139 0.0758088955206 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107125694629 0.150359130593 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0422728349305 0.0667264976115 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 14.1392134831 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 12.1639044944 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 100.480337079 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.