It is sometimes not black and white to determine whether a novice or an expert may come up with more innovations in a field of study. While it may be true that beginners can have more agile and less biased mind to see the whole picture and discover something new, I stand with the view that they will likely lack profound skillsets and essential experience to outperform experts in many areas.
To begin with, it is undeniable that many fields require specific knowledge and experience built up over time to excel at. It can be very hard for neophytes who might just be fresh out of college to seek breakthroughs as chances are there are various issues in reality they have never faced that differ from theories studied at university. For instance, in science, it can take years to drill into the questions and probe relative materials. Einstein had to have a solid grasp of Newtonian physics to develop his space relativity, and it took him about ten years to do that. Another example can be illustrated in musical or art industries, where people have to spend years brushing up their skills to be able to compose professionally or create their own masterpiece. Beginners without adequate experience and skills will hence unlikely to contribute much to their fields.
However, in some cases, a novice might be more open-minded to new ideas, in contrast with an expert being in the field for years and might be biased toward particular topics. For instance, in science, an expert might need to spend years digging on an issue and experimenting while the world is vastly and continuously changing. A beginner with fresher mind may come up with innovative ideas germane to the latest social demands and trends. There are great examples like Mark Zuckerberg, who dropped out of Harvard to focus on inventing an online social platform called Facebook, which is ubiquitous these days but was an undeveloped technology a few years back. Another titan is Bill Gates, who is also a college dropout but was able to establish his own company and develop it to the stage of a giant tech as it is today. Thus, a tyro is not always not contributive.
In conclusion, while an agile mind opening to new notions might help a beginner to achieve remarkable success in his or her field, an expert with competent skill sets and long experience will likely make greater contributions.
- Butter has now been replaced by margarine in Happy Pancake House restaurants throughout the southwestern United States Only about 2 percent of customers have complained indicating that 98 people out of 100 are happy with the change Furthermore many server 79
- Claim While boredom is often expressed with a sense of self satisfaction it should really be a source of embarrassment Reason Boredom arises from a lack of imagination and self motivation 86
- In any field of inquiry the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions 75
- In the last century the first man to walk on the moon said it was a giant leap for mankind However some people think it has made little difference to our daily lives To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The table below shows information and predictions regarding the change in percentage of the population aged 65 and above in three countries
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, may, so, thus, while, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, in some cases, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 58.6224719101 104% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1969.0 2235.4752809 88% => OK
No of words: 407.0 442.535393258 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83783783784 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49157444576 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68688469182 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 215.323595506 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567567567568 0.4932671777 115% => OK
syllable_count: 623.7 704.065955056 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.2978586528 60.3974514979 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.266666667 118.986275619 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1333333333 23.4991977007 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.2 5.21951772744 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147036830579 0.243740707755 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0491563609031 0.0831039109588 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0533807580682 0.0758088955206 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112460165516 0.150359130593 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0539895887415 0.0667264976115 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 14.1392134831 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 48.8420337079 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 12.1743820225 103% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 12.1639044944 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 100.480337079 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.