Contributions in general in any field need to be analyzed first in order to refute/accept the claim that beginners are more likely to engender important contributions. A contribution in any discipline can be made analogus to the output of a basic input-processing-output system. Here for a contribution to be important, it should have in it the aspects of innovation and being tangible. These two qualities then can be mapped to input and processing repsectively. With this we can evaluate these aspects individually to reach a conclusion.
With repsect to innovations, one can find multiple examples of inventions and discoveries happening simultaneously in different parts of world like the invention of steam engine, camera etc. Such phenomena can be explained best by the reasoning that, to see new possibilities in any field, one has to know throughly the current status of his/her field, its challenges and limitations of the current solutions. Ingenuity is naturally possesed by the people attaining a certain expertise in their field and can happen simultaneously. Thus experts play a huge role in the innovation component.
To see any tangible results, not only inputs but the processing of inputs is also required. To discern the conclusion that experts are more adept at processing, one can deduce from the fact that the experts are more capable in separating the gold from the garbage due to their expertise. Experts also know tried and tested methods both in efficiency and variety to take a thought from intuition to fruition. The expertise that comes from years of experience is important for productivity.
From the above analysis, one can conclude that it will be quite deterimental to neglect the role of experts in any field. Both aspects of any contribution need the required support of expertise. However, one should also not neglect the role novice minds play in bringing fresh perspectives and keeping a machinery from being antiquated. A general aspect of liveliness and energy brought by naevity engenders more daring attempts which otherwise would have been absent in any body consisting only of wary experts.
- Some people believe that college students should consider only their own talents and interests when choosing a field of study Others believe that college students should base their choice of a field of study on the availability of jobs in that field 75
- In any field of inquiry the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take I 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 533, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...ir field and can happen simultaneously. Thus experts play a huge role in the innovat...
^^^^
Line 7, column 472, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[2]
Message: Did you mean 'anybody'?
Suggestion: anybody
...ich otherwise would have been absent in any body consisting only of wary experts.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, then, thus, as to, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 33.0505617978 54% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 58.6224719101 99% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1802.0 2235.4752809 81% => OK
No of words: 343.0 442.535393258 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25364431487 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20376991085 2.79657885939 115% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 215.323595506 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.548104956268 0.4932671777 111% => OK
syllable_count: 578.7 704.065955056 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.4566274391 60.3974514979 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.0 118.986275619 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1764705882 23.4991977007 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.76470588235 5.21951772744 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158069905784 0.243740707755 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0505550681923 0.0831039109588 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0357729070965 0.0758088955206 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0946669561316 0.150359130593 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00735357464844 0.0667264976115 11% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 14.1392134831 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 48.8420337079 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.1639044944 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.38706741573 110% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 100.480337079 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.