In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
As a famous adage goes – “Nothing is new under the Sun”. Everything that is to be discovered has already been discovered. This might not always hold true. As long as there are humans, there will always be new ideas and novel things to discover and invent in the still unexplored realms. The assertion that in any field or profession a beginner is more likely to make important contributions than an expert is a controversial one. On the one hand, this assertion might hold true for most of the technological advances of the Twenty-First century. However, advances related to esoteric Science fields, years of toil and experience are a must. However, in the final analysis it must be noted that experience along with a never ending zeal to explore and discover something new is essential for the discovery or invention of novel things.
Considering the case of Google, a tech giant and one the most precious companies of 21st century was basically modelled around a simple idea of a search engine that could filter out all irrelevant details and provide the most useful results based on the search terms entered by the user. It was a university project given to two students of Stanford University. It was not that this idea didn’t exist before the two students’ implementation, the so-called experts didn’t have the enthusiasm, imagination or the dedication to sit and work on this idea to make it a reality. Also, Microsoft another tech giant, was established by Bill Gates while he was still in his college. It took the world by force when it released its easy-to-use Graphical User Interface. Hence, the author’s observations that a newbie could contribute more to a field than any expert can might hold true here.
Moreover, one might consider the field of sports, in which an athlete is expected to perform the best in his prime years. Once, the athlete ages, his energy diminishes and he is no longer able to compete with young blood. Here the author’s statement that - “, a beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions” would not hold true. For instance, Sachin Tendulkar, a renowned Indian cricketer, performed the best on the field while still in his twenties. Once he entered the thirties, his performance diminished and gracefully retired from the profession.
Conversely, one might consider the field of science. An expert in any field has become so because of his deep-rooted passion and the endless hours of toil he put, to gain an extensive knowledge in his subject. An expert has a comprehensive understanding of his subject. Armed with passion towards the field of inquiry and equipped with knowledge gained from endless hours of hard toil, an expert is more likely to make groundbreaking contributions than fledgling novices who have just entered the workforce. For instance, Albert Einstein one of the most revered physicist and mathematician of the twentieth century is remembered even now for his work on “Theory of Relativity”. Had he not gained expertise in his field, we most likely won’t have been able to understand the cosmos and its functioning.
In a nutshell, even though a beginner brimming with enthusiasm is more likely to make contributions into his career, an expert’s extensive knowledge about a subject cannot be taken for granted. A beginner is more likely to possess a new perspective to look at the same problem however he lacks the firsthand experience that only an expert has. Anybody with an in-depth knowledge and an unending desire to constantly explore and learn is can surely make nodal contributions.
- Governments should offer college and university education free of charge to all students.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In devel 92
- “A ten-year nationwide study of the effectiveness of wearing a helmet while bicycling indicates that ten years ago, approximately 35 percent of all bicyclists reported wearing helmets, whereas today that number is nearly 80 percent. Another study, howev 83
- “Laws should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances, times, and places” 74
- Issue: - In most professions and academic fields, imagination is more important than knowledge. 58
- Claim: We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from those whose views contradict our own.Reason: Disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagre 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
As a famous adage goes – 'Nothing i...
^^^^
Line 1, column 539, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: Twenty-First
...st of the technological advances of the Twenty First century. However, advances related to e...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...iscovery or invention of novel things. Considering the case of Google, a te...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n any expert can might hold true here. Moreover, one might consider the fie...
^^^
Line 5, column 259, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... blood. Here the author’s statement that ', a beginner is more likely than t...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...acefully retired from the profession. Conversely, one might consider the f...
^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and the cosmos and its functioning. In a nutshell, even though a beginner br...
^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'conversely', 'first', 'hence', 'however', 'look', 'moreover', 'so', 'still', 'thus', 'while', 'for instance']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.242245199409 0.240241500013 101% => OK
Verbs: 0.147710487445 0.157235817809 94% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0812407680945 0.0880659088768 92% => OK
Adverbs: 0.069423929099 0.0497285424764 140% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0384047267356 0.0444667217837 86% => OK
Prepositions: 0.107828655835 0.12292977631 88% => OK
Participles: 0.0384047267356 0.0406280797675 95% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.93920013214 2.79330140395 105% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0295420974889 0.030933414821 96% => OK
Particles: 0.00295420974889 0.0016655270985 177% => OK
Determiners: 0.113737075332 0.0997080785238 114% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0206794682422 0.0249443105267 83% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00738552437223 0.0148568991511 50% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 3657.0 2732.02544248 134% => OK
No of words: 604.0 452.878318584 133% => OK
Chars per words: 6.05463576159 6.0361032391 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.95746018188 4.58838876751 108% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.350993377483 0.366273622748 96% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.269867549669 0.280924506359 96% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.19701986755 0.200843997647 98% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.140728476821 0.132149295362 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93920013214 2.79330140395 105% => OK
Unique words: 298.0 219.290929204 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.493377483444 0.48968727796 101% => OK
Word variations: 61.1882467435 55.4138127331 110% => OK
How many sentences: 28.0 20.6194690265 136% => OK
Sentence length: 21.5714285714 23.380412469 92% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.8387095856 59.4972553346 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.607142857 141.124799967 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5714285714 23.380412469 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.464285714286 0.674092028746 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.21349557522 134% => OK
Readability: 48.5581835383 51.4728631049 94% => OK
Elegance: 1.52023121387 1.64882698954 92% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.521312364764 0.391690518653 133% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0965504719184 0.123202303941 78% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0711329873173 0.077325440228 92% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.478903853673 0.547984918172 87% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.137741555655 0.149214159877 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.182931212298 0.161403998019 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0997343471985 0.0892212321368 112% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.401086655443 0.385218514788 104% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0573150515447 0.0692045440612 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.366800742607 0.275328986314 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0562913307074 0.0653680567796 86% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.4325221239 153% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.30420353982 94% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88274336283 143% => OK
Positive topic words: 14.0 7.22455752212 194% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 3.66592920354 109% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 2.70907079646 148% => OK
Total topic words: 22.0 13.5995575221 162% => OK
---------------------
Rates: 83.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6