Any leader who is quickly and easily influenced by shifts in popular opinion will accomplish little.
Statement claims that any leader will acquire little accomplishment of result if leader is faltered by popular opinion. Whenever any company galvanize idea of new invention or field of study tries to discover new methodological process, or government try to make new policy, there are always public that go against these ideas. Maybe because the new idea is not valuable enough to consider, or there could be a defect in that idea. However, leader should embed the fact that there is controversial debate in any type of new ideas, leader of company, field of study and government should go forward without following popular opinion.
To begin with, innovational theory, new invention is not easily come to achieve. There are always people who are dilatory when their work is in hardship. They would harangue about innovative ideas because it is hard to achieve and that couldn’t be realistic view. However, if leader follow that popular opinion which don’t pursue the new idea, then leader can’t achieve what he wants to get, instead he possibly has less beneficial point. For example, when it comes to evolutionary theory, Darwin, the person who made this theory, which affords his pinpoint even though there are many types of pitfall. In that era, religion is more popular idea than science. However, science surmounted a boundaries and developed the theories of sciences.
Furthermore, leader of company and government should not be waffled by the popular opinion. When leader can be one of owner of company or leader owns presidency, he shouldn’t be one that is wavered because he has responsibility that support his own dedication toward nation or company. Just because popular opinion does affect leader, it doesn’t mean that leader should follow.
Conclusively, popular opinion sometimes affect leader’s decision negatively. Leader is chosen to be decide whether those ideas are good or bad. The motto of leader is to pursue not just his own accomplishment, but also to most people who related to him. Therefore, to achieve beneficial results, leader should decide himself not by popular opinion.
- Claim: The best test of an argument is its ability to convince someone with an opposing viewpoint.Reason: Only by being forced to defend an idea against the doubts and contrasting views of others does on really discover the value of that idea. 62
- The effectiveness of a country’s leaders is best measured by examining the well-being of that country’s citizens. 66
- Some people believe that college students should consider only their own talents and interests when choosing a field of study. Others believe that college students should base their choice of a field of study on the availability of jobs in that field. 54
- The president of Grove College has recommended that the college abandon its century-old tradition of all-female education and begin admitting men. Pointing to other all-female colleges that experienced an increase in applications after adopting coeducatio 50
- The following appeared in a memo from a vice president of Quiot Manufacturing.During the past year, Quiot Manufacturing had 30 percent more on-the-job accidents than at the nearby Panoply Industries plant, where the work shifts are one hour shorter than o 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 160, Rule ID: NEW_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'invention'.
Suggestion: invention
... Whenever any company galvanize idea of new invention or field of study tries to discover new...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 37, Rule ID: NEW_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'invention'.
Suggestion: invention
.... To begin with, innovational theory, new invention is not easily come to achieve. There ar...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, may, so, then, therefore, for example, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.3162921348 159% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 58.6224719101 63% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1802.0 2235.4752809 81% => OK
No of words: 341.0 442.535393258 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28445747801 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81169130007 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 215.323595506 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.539589442815 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 577.8 704.065955056 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Interrogative: 2.0 0.740449438202 270% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.5639771492 60.3974514979 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.111111111 118.986275619 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9444444444 23.4991977007 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.94444444444 5.21951772744 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267298033907 0.243740707755 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0965304715391 0.0831039109588 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0896293275967 0.0758088955206 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173013329385 0.150359130593 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0371950930774 0.0667264976115 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.1639044944 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 100.480337079 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.