"The most essential quality of an effective leader is the ability to remain consistently committed to particular principles and objectives. Any leader who is quickly and easily influenced by shifts in popular opinion will accomplish little."
There is no book or any movie which can make someone an effective leader, but it's the person's quality of standing out and believing in his own terms and still working with a team. The statement focuses on the most essential quality of an effective leader and him or her being consistently committed to his principles and objectives. As the writer continues that the leader who can be easily influenced by the shifts in popular opinions will accomplish a little.
In my opinion, the main point of the statement is positive but the way it expresses itself tells about the writer's ingenuity. Definitely an effective leader should be committed to her principles and objectives, but one of the most important quality of a good leader is having the patience to listen to her team members and working on the problem along with them, even if at times it makes her change her principles. Being a leader is an invitation to the opportunities, risks, competitions, and opponents, and if someone isn't willing to change according to the situation, it will be undermining his own path. For example, one of the biggest companies working today, Facebook, which was facing backlashes from its customers when another social platform went on trending, Instagram, where people reduced spending time on Facebook. So, to overcome this particular problem, the company changed its basic format, and rather updated some of the features similar to Instagram, and some better than that.
If the big companies like Facebook can face backlashes and are ready to change its principles to get the public back onto the platform, then why not a leader can. A leader is expected to work firmly with all the profits under his name, but according to the statement, he should not be changing his principles according to the popular opinions. If he is not willing not change according to the market and the public opinion, then he will not be able to sell his idea on long terms.
I would rather consider it a weakness, which the writer in the statement points out as a flaw. Of course, one should not be influenced by the failures, or the claptrap going on in the public, but one should also not ignore it. It is one of the best ways of finding a flaw in oneself, which gives an opportunity to improve. Additionally, if the leader himself isn't open to change, then he or she should also not expect much from his team members and big accomplishments are way in the long path.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-12 | Rashi123 | 66 | view |
| 2019-07-13 | Sachin7878 | 62 | view |
| 2019-07-13 | Sachin7878 | 62 | view |
| 2019-05-05 | atiras | 54 | view |
| 2016-05-25 | meenalsingh492 | 75 | view |
- "The human mind will always be superior to machines because machines are only tools of human minds." 62
- The following appeared in the editorial section of a health and fitness magazine. "In a study of the effects of exercise on longevity, medical researchers tracked 500 middle-aged men over a 20-year period. The subjects represented a variety of occup 53
- Salaries of teachers should be affected by the academic performances of the students 54
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Countries should not isolate themselves from the world but instead engage other countries. Use examples and reasons to support your position. 73
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore the negative ones. 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 79, Rule ID: IT_IS[17]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...n make someone an effective leader, but its the persons quality of standing out and...
^^^
Line 1, column 334, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...itted to his principles and objectives. As the writer continues that the leader wh...
^^
Line 1, column 463, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ular opinions will accomplish a little. In my opinion, the main point of the sta...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 108, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'writers'' or 'writer's'?
Suggestion: writers'; writer's
...way it expresses itself tells about the writers ingenuity. Definitely an effective lead...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 522, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...etitions, and opponents, and if someone isnt willing to change according to the situ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 928, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...ed its basic format, and rather updated some of the features similar to Instagram, and some...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 360, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...ve. Additionally, if the leader himself isnt open to change, then he or she should a...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, still, then, for example, of course, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 14.8657303371 148% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 37.0 33.0505617978 112% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 58.6224719101 94% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2028.0 2235.4752809 91% => OK
No of words: 425.0 442.535393258 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77176470588 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54043259262 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70940946591 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.494117647059 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 629.1 704.065955056 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 9.0 1.77640449438 507% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 23.0359550562 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.8646239118 60.3974514979 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.2 118.986275619 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.3333333333 23.4991977007 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6 5.21951772744 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258311035176 0.243740707755 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0962373698682 0.0831039109588 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10853382117 0.0758088955206 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181850308639 0.150359130593 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.144376149646 0.0667264976115 216% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 14.1392134831 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 12.1639044944 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 100.480337079 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 11.2143820225 118% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.