"In any realm of life---whether academic, social, business, or political---the only way to succeed is to take a practical, rather than an idealistic, point of view. Pragmatic behavior guarantees survival, whereas idealistic views tend to be superseded by

This above statement asserts that a practical point of view is more important than an idealistic one in the case of success. I agree with that statement, and additionally concede that idealistic views often tend to superseded by simpler, more immediate options. This very world is increasingly competitive and pragmatic, where most of the success strongly depend on pragmatism.

First of all, a student learns the facts and concepts accordance with the field of study since he can use those in his further life. If he only relies on idealistic point of view, he would get to know a little about the practical events that are happening surrounding him. A student, who is taking courses to be doctor, must know the usages of his academic learning, otherwise his non practical knowledge only push the situations to severe ones. Additionally, that student whose field of study is chemistry, should acquire pragmatic knowledge of the elements he reading in the corresponding courses. He must know the characteristic of a particular substance, and what it would bring, when a reaction takes place between that and other substances.

Similarly, an entrepreneur, who is proceeding to start a business, must know the practical concepts regarding that business, trends of the contemporary. Only, the idea won’t come any sort of help, if that entrepreneur lacks pragmatic point of view. Suppose, an entrepreneur wants to start a business with an idea: taking people from one place to another using motorcycle. But, before starting that he must acquire practical information relating that business idea: population of the targeted area, other means of transportation, city dwellers' wish and so forth. If the entrepreneur starts his business without the clear concept of those means, only be contingent upon his idealistic view, that very business undoubtedly won’t be beneficial to him by any means.

Finally, society is inundated with variant societal problems, and those need immediate as well as more realistic solutions. For instance, nuclear weapon possesses a great threat for this very world. Every puissant nation around the world, have enriched them with destructive nuclear weapons. The usage of those minatory weapons should be control, and that be done obviously in the practical way. Similarly, every nation is represented by it’s politics by some means. A politician convincingly plays a vital role for a nation. People vote the politician to take care of corresponding nation, and so, politicians become a sort of protector of that nation. They admittedly should take initiatives to improve the condition as well as come up with pragmatic solutions of the problems a nation is facing.

To sum, ideas are undoubtedly important but pragmatism has significance to give those ideas realistic forms. Otherwise, only idea can’t ever bring any sort of success to the mankind.

Votes
Average: 8.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 563, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'reads'.
Suggestion: reads
... pragmatic knowledge of the elements he reading in the corresponding courses. He must k...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 339, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'controlled'?
Suggestion: controlled
...age of those minatory weapons should be control, and that be done obviously in the prac...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, if, regarding, similarly, so, well, for instance, sort of, as well as, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.3162921348 159% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 33.0505617978 118% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 58.6224719101 106% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2447.0 2235.4752809 109% => OK
No of words: 459.0 442.535393258 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3311546841 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62863751936 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98685579988 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 249.0 215.323595506 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542483660131 0.4932671777 110% => OK
syllable_count: 763.2 704.065955056 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.7951005719 60.3974514979 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 106.391304348 118.986275619 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9565217391 23.4991977007 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.52173913043 5.21951772744 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206121621052 0.243740707755 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0568433984136 0.0831039109588 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0540550157173 0.0758088955206 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108040553015 0.150359130593 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0429131152996 0.0667264976115 64% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 14.1392134831 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.1639044944 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 100.480337079 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.