In any realm of life---whether academic, social, business, or political---the only way to
succeed is to take a practical, rather than an idealistic, point of view. Pragmatic behavior
guarantees survival, whereas idealistic views tend to be superceded by simpler, more
immediate options.
Humans have always been divided in terms of quixotic and prgamatic people. But as one matures and goes through the course of life, with the accretion of experiences at every step, the utopian views for life transmogrify into pragmatism. I strongly believe a practical approach towards life is a approach towards success in all fields, like academic, social, business or political. The following two reasons delineate why I opine as such.
Pragmatic approach in life helps us from having false hopes that soon turn to expectations, that are bound to be shattered. For example, being an average kid in the class, if I have a utopian hope that I will achieve the highest grade in class, not only will I fail to acheive the highest grade, rather I will have false hopes that I will be able to achieve my goal. Being pragmatic at the same juncture of my life I would have taken one step at a time and worked my way towards the highest grade assiduosly. My utopian viewpoint would coerce me to hope that I actually can achieve a highest grade even though when I actually will have no prescient plan in mind to achieve the same. When I fail it would be a disheartening experience as the false expectations and hopes and shatter. This goes to show why we should be more pragmatic could bolster us to actually reach our goals and also maintain them instead of being ephemeral achievements.
Pragmatic Behaviour helps us discover the things around us in reality that can be of help to us in our road to survival. An example of the current corporate sector can be cited, where there is one needs to be highly competent and conversant in the required domains to secure a job. Someone with quixotic views about life and the job opportunities would fail to spot the nuances that help someone secure a job. A person with pragmatic view towards the same opportunities would try to use resources like university placement councillor's advise, or alumnus who were once or are contemporarily a part of the company. They would seek and use the resources that would be essential to get selected for the job. Thus, pragmatic people, always look for the viable and feasible options available to them instead of having utopian ideas that might sound ambitious but are not worth the effort without the right appurtenances.
In sum, though some people might say that utopian outlook towards life may lead to ambitious goals that a person might set for themselves, but they fail to elucidate how will the person attain the goal if there is no practical and well reasoned plan at hand. Thus the above two reasons buttress my opinions on the issue of whether one should have an pragmatic or idealisic point of view of life.
- The following is a memorandum from the director of personnel to the president of Get Away Airlines Since our mechanics are responsible for inspecting and maintaining our aircraft Get Away Airlines should pay to send them to the Quality Care Seminar a two 66
- Claim The emergence of the online blogosphere has significantly weakened the quality of political discourse in the United States Reason When anyone can publish political opinions easily standards for covering news and political topics will inevitably decl 75
- All too often companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees such consultants would be unnecessary 50
- The following appeared in a memo from the mayor of the town of West Egg Two years ago our consultants predicted that West Egg s landfill which is used for garbage disposal would be completely filled within five years During the past two years however town 68
- The following appeared in a letter from the manager of a rock band named Double Rice One year ago tickets for Double Rice s concerts in stadiums around the country took on average at least 24 hours to sell out if they sold out at all But the band has been 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 294, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ve a practical approach towards life is a approach towards success in all fields,...
^
Line 2, column 582, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
... me to hope that I actually can achieve a highest grade even though when I actual...
^
Line 3, column 39, Rule ID: NOUN_AROUND_IT[1]
Message: Consider using 'the surrounding things'?
Suggestion: the surrounding things
... Pragmatic Behaviour helps us discover the things around us in reality that can be of help to us in...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 259, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...actical and well reasoned plan at hand. Thus the above two reasons buttress my opini...
^^^^
Line 4, column 347, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...on the issue of whether one should have an pragmatic or idealisic point of view of...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, if, look, may, so, thus, well, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 23.0 12.4196629213 185% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 33.0505617978 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 58.6224719101 97% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2225.0 2235.4752809 100% => OK
No of words: 472.0 442.535393258 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71398305085 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6610686524 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61712063497 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 215.323595506 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.487288135593 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 706.5 704.065955056 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.968806334 60.3974514979 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.611111111 118.986275619 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2222222222 23.4991977007 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.21951772744 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154345610764 0.243740707755 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0511991181792 0.0831039109588 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0392856641378 0.0758088955206 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.097949240957 0.150359130593 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00747471873284 0.0667264976115 11% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 48.8420337079 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 12.1639044944 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 100.480337079 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.