In any situation, progress requires discussion among people who have contrasting points of views
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The topic raises a controversial issue of whether we need discussions in order to develop. Some may say that the discussion is costly and typically slows down the adoption of beneficial policies or technologies. Nevertheless, if we don’t have a proper discussion, all controversies of the issue remain hidden or unaddressed until it is too late to resolve them without harsh consequences. Thus, I generally disagree with the opinion that we don’t need discussions for progressing and would argue that debating contrasting points of view is beneficial.
To begin with, any discussion helps to look deeper into its subject and spot critical points and problems at an early stage of a project. To be specific, consider the fall of the USSR. When the country split and newborn Russia tried to reinvent its economy’s structure, there were debates on how to redistribute government property. These debates were largely amongst experts and politicians and hardly involved common citizens of the country. In the end, the proposed privatization reform created huge inequality amongst citizen as people didn’t understand how it worked and were willing to sell their property right for very low prices. Given that the policymakers didn’t want this outcome, they admitted see that the policy failed. We can see from this example that crucial policy measures require huge public discussion amongst the wide audience and not only amongst experts with a specific worldview.
Furthermore, it is crucial for a discussion to introduce as many contrasting points of view as possible because the contrasts help to reveal a full spectrum of potential problems. For example, take the USA. The political system there consists of the two parties which represent the full spectrum of right and left views. While discussing any policy in the congress, the representation of both Democrats and Republicans makes sure that policymakers consider both distributional consequences of a reform and its implication for personal freedoms as well as simple costs and benefits. This contrasting allows for balancing opinions and seeing all the issues without overrepresenting one point of view.
However, one can reasonably argue that in some situations we need to act quickly and discussion may destroy the possibility to progress. One example of such situation can be a war. During a war, army should coordinate and make fast decisions to not lose people and territory. In such severe conditions, it seems beneficial to delegate decision-making to an authoritarian body, which doesn’t bother with discussion. However, most armies allow for discussions amongst generals before making crucial decisions as it was proven to be efficient through the long history of wars for the same reasons described above: discussion helps with identifying crucial problems in their full spectrum. So, we need discussions even in the critical situations.
Summing up, although it may be tempting to not discuss seemingly beneficial actions before implementing them for the sake of progress, we cannot disregard the value of discussion as it allows us to see hidden issues and resolve controversies at an early stage. Even in the extreme situations, we need to discuss contrasting views to make right decisions. In fact, democracy as an ultimate form of discussion is one of the most important drivers of human race development in recent decades.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-26 | cringelord | 83 | view |
- Governments should not fund any scientific research whose consequences are unclear Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing a 79
- Governments should not fund any scientific research whose consequence are unclear Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing an 79
- Governments should not fund any scientific research whose consequence are unclear Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing an 45
- In any situation progress requires discussion among people who have contrasting points of views Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In deve 83
- Summarize the main points in the lecture and then explain how they cast doubt on the ideas in the reading passage Passage Because of its remote location only a few species of plants and animals thrived on Easter Island and the water surrounding it contain 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 101, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'saith', 'says'.
Suggestion: saith; says
...scussions in order to develop. Some may say that the discussion is costly and typic...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, look, may, nevertheless, so, thus, well, while, for example, in fact, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 33.0505617978 112% => OK
Preposition: 71.0 58.6224719101 121% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2875.0 2235.4752809 129% => OK
No of words: 537.0 442.535393258 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35381750466 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.81386128306 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04517960333 2.79657885939 109% => OK
Unique words: 293.0 215.323595506 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545623836127 0.4932671777 111% => OK
syllable_count: 883.8 704.065955056 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.9968249212 60.3974514979 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.0 118.986275619 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.48 23.4991977007 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.04 5.21951772744 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228299230293 0.243740707755 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0635342887504 0.0831039109588 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0479880969228 0.0758088955206 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133098362968 0.150359130593 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0334731703109 0.0667264976115 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 14.1392134831 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.1639044944 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.38706741573 108% => OK
difficult_words: 148.0 100.480337079 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.