As human beings, each person has a unique perspective on each subject based on his/her life experiences. As a result, everyone has his/her own opinion about what is progress and how you can achieve it. Some believe that you do not need to listen to others who have contrasting points of view because they may intend to interrupt you. Although their opinion would be correct in some situations I disagree with this view and progress can be made by discovering the minds of others.
Firstly, contrasting ideas are constructive which means we can identify our flaws which did not be recognized from our view. Each contrasting view of points is equal to one fault from that view. For instance, if you are a manager of a product team, the whole team has the same goal; launching the product. Therefore, each idea is compatible with the goal even the contrasting one. Hence, by evaluating this kind of ideas we can improve the product and prevent failure in the future. Although matched opinions can augment the quality of work contrasting ones are much more effective and are essential for improvement.
Secondly, contrasting ideas allow you to broaden your mind and knowledge. hearing an idea which is not in line with your opinion encourages you to read and search more about the subject than before. Therefore, you would scrutiny the subject not only from your perspective but also from different views and aspects. As a result, you can gain more information and knowledge which means more reliability in your decision making and improvement can achieve. As a personal experience, I had a course named Machine Learning last semester. For doing its homework, my friend and I always argued about our solutions to homework. This kind of relationship always promoted me to read more and search the points I did not recognize them until my friend indicated them. Finally, I could feel my advance in this course thanks to my friend.
Besides all the above reasons and many other ones, it is trustworthy to infer that contrasting ideas can have negative effects on progress, and not only they would not cause an improvement but also interrupt it and even prevent it. The argument with people who only want to be an obstacle to your improvement is just wasting time. As a proposal, it is better to hear the opinions of trusted people whose contrasting points of view are valuable.
To wrap up, the positive effects of contrasting points of view on progress are more than the matched ones. This kind of view is essential to notice our faults and extend our knowledge and mind. In fact, without fault correction and broad knowledge, no one can make progress. Nonetheless, contrasting opinions can prohibit progress and waste valuable time by inefficient arguments.
- In any situation progress requires discussion among people who have contrasting points of view Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In devel 50
- Competition for high grades seriously limits the quality of learning at all levels of education Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In deve 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Successful leaders should make others part of the decision making process 76
- Humans arrived in the Kaliko Islands about 7 000 years ago and within 3 000 years most ofthe large mammal species that had lived in the forests of the Kaliko Islands had becomeextinct Y et humans cannot have been a factor in the species extinctions be 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement After high school students should have at least oneyear to work or travel It s better than attendinguniversity straight away 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 75, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Hearing
...you to broaden your mind and knowledge. hearing an idea which is not in line with your ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 519, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to last'
Suggestion: to last
..., I had a course named Machine Learning last semester. For doing its homework, my fr...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, finally, first, firstly, hence, if, may, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, for instance, in fact, kind of, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 53.0 33.0505617978 160% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 58.6224719101 97% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2299.0 2235.4752809 103% => OK
No of words: 466.0 442.535393258 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93347639485 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64618479453 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69009455322 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 215.323595506 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.495708154506 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 708.3 704.065955056 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.10617977528 258% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.6921118365 60.3974514979 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 91.96 118.986275619 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.64 23.4991977007 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.21951772744 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262640994326 0.243740707755 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0757797020619 0.0831039109588 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0586858603501 0.0758088955206 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151561402753 0.150359130593 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0339678448603 0.0667264976115 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 14.1392134831 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 48.8420337079 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.71 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 100.480337079 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.