The presented argument talks about tracing a unique pattern found in woven baskets to the prehistoric village of Palea but, after finding a similar basket in a village across the river to Palea, concludes that the Palean baskets are not uniquely endemic to Palea. The argument might be correct in its conclusion but it fails to address other factors which warrant a detailed discussion.
The first question that needs to be answered is the extent of similarity of the basket found in Lithos with the ones found only in the vicinity of Palea. It’s mentioned archaeologists discovered a “so-called” basket in Lithos. The term “so-called” is pretty vague to be relied upon. Were the baskets found in Lithos had exactly same patterns as those found in Palea? It could be the case that the natives of both regions separately made baskets with a matching -- but not exactly similar -- pattern.
The argument mentions that the Brim river was deep and broad and could only be crossed by a boat and since no boats were found, the two villages could not have exchanged items across the river. Anthropological studies might reveal that the two villages had friendly relations with each other and exchanged items across the river using wooden logs which suggests a possibility of finding a Palean basket across the river as well. Even if they could not have contacted each other due to the breadth of river reaching miles, someone, in Palea, might have floated a basket in the river and it reached Lithos and the people there got inspired to make baskets using the same pattern.
The argument doesn’t mention about the thoroughness of the search conducted for boats. They might have used boats and the boats got drifted away with the flow of the river and the researchers failed to take this factor into account.
Only after answering the above possible questions can a definite conclusion be reached.
- The best way to solve environmental problems caused by consumer-generated waste is for towns and cities to impose strict limits on the amount of trash they will accept from each household.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree 58
- A recent study indicates that children living in the Himalayan mountain region in Nepal have lower levels of tooth decay than children living in suburban areas in the United States, despite the fact that people in the Himalayan mountain region in Nepal re 50
- Governments should offer a free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take 50
- The most effective way to understand contemporary culture is to analyze the trends of its youth. 58
- Claim: It is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero.Reason: The reputation of anyone who is subjected to media scrutiny will eventually be diminished.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...which warrant a detailed discussion. The first question that needs to be answere...
^^^
Line 3, column 201, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...s;s mentioned archaeologists discovered a 'so-called' basket in Lithos....
^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'first', 'if', 'so', 'well']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.252077562327 0.240241500013 105% => OK
Verbs: 0.15512465374 0.157235817809 99% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0803324099723 0.0880659088768 91% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0443213296399 0.0497285424764 89% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0193905817175 0.0444667217837 44% => OK
Prepositions: 0.119113573407 0.12292977631 97% => OK
Participles: 0.0554016620499 0.0406280797675 136% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.77589724118 2.79330140395 99% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0249307479224 0.030933414821 81% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.138504155125 0.0997080785238 139% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0249307479224 0.0249443105267 100% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.01108033241 0.0148568991511 75% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1927.0 2732.02544248 71% => OK
No of words: 322.0 452.878318584 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.98447204969 6.0361032391 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.58838876751 92% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.354037267081 0.366273622748 97% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.251552795031 0.280924506359 90% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.158385093168 0.200843997647 79% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0807453416149 0.132149295362 61% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77589724118 2.79330140395 99% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 219.290929204 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.503105590062 0.48968727796 103% => OK
Word variations: 51.3741290565 55.4138127331 93% => OK
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6194690265 63% => OK
Sentence length: 24.7692307692 23.380412469 106% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.1325457871 59.4972553346 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.230769231 141.124799967 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7692307692 23.380412469 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.384615384615 0.674092028746 57% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.21349557522 38% => OK
Readability: 49.9245102723 51.4728631049 97% => OK
Elegance: 1.94936708861 1.64882698954 118% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.468930903203 0.391690518653 120% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.172373021536 0.123202303941 140% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.120648643742 0.077325440228 156% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.68020220242 0.547984918172 124% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.176876154034 0.149214159877 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.208363029973 0.161403998019 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109717382765 0.0892212321368 123% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.36945671515 0.385218514788 96% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.146446530904 0.0692045440612 212% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.286615900578 0.275328986314 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0902096778446 0.0653680567796 138% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.4325221239 38% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.30420353982 94% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88274336283 82% => OK
Positive topic words: 3.0 7.22455752212 42% => OK
Negative topic words: 5.0 3.66592920354 136% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.70907079646 74% => OK
Total topic words: 10.0 13.5995575221 74% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.