Art does not exist unless it is shared it requires both artist and audience

Today, humans have grown to such an extent where numerous types of art forms exist that we aren’t even aware of. Right from Sand arts to artists making portraits from Rubix cubes is quite mesmerizing, to say the least. Various art forms today involve an audience directly or indirectly. However, the claim that art does not exist unless it is shared is not entirely true.

Consider art forms such as dancing, theatre, music, etc. We usually associate these with an audience, a stage, or a concert hall. We can consider them as direct interaction with an audience. Nowadays, we also watch them from the comfort of our homes on our TV or the internet which can be considered as an indirect connection with the audience. However, these are, in both ways, audience-based. Rather, these are better shared and enjoyed together.

Artists today have made a living out of art. May it be singers, dancers, or even street performers. It is the people or the audience that fuels them and keeps them going. Consider a street instrument artist who has learned a multitude of instruments all by himself, without having support from his family. He cannot survive without performming in front of an audience. We have seen many examples of street artists being helpless with their pockets empty, especially in pandemic times. An audience is a crucial part of this art form.

However, artists that perform only for their personal satisfaction or personal enjoyment also exist. Not calling them artists or their work as art, will be entirely unfair to them. For example, a senior citizen, all alone without a family, performs painting or drawing only for personal satisfaction or for that matter passing of his time, does not specifically need an audience. If painting gives him mental peace, and satisfaction without a need of an audience, we have no right to not call it art. This can be considered as a solitary form of art. Consequently, even meditation today can be considered a form of art. Being it the meditation state for a certain amount of time requires practice and is not easily achievable. Monks have been doing this all their lives. After all, the audience is something that is definitely not needed here.

For these reasons, we can say that art can be considered as both, audience as well as non-audience based. Although an art form is better shared and enjoyed together, it can also very well be performed for ourselves without sharing it necessarily with an audience.

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 192, Rule ID: NOW_A_DAYS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'nowadays'?
Suggestion: Nowadays
... a direct interaction with an audience. Now a days, we also watch them from the comfort of...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 196, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a day' or simply 'days'?
Suggestion: a day; days
...irect interaction with an audience. Now a days, we also watch them from the comfort of...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 396, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Rather,
...hese are, in both ways, audience based. Rather these are better shared and enjoyed tog...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 75, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
... art can be considered as both audience as well as non-audience based. Although an art for...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, however, if, may, so, well, after all, for example, such as, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 33.0505617978 136% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 58.6224719101 67% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 12.9106741573 178% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2061.0 2235.4752809 92% => OK
No of words: 426.0 442.535393258 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83802816901 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54310108192 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61147359798 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.495305164319 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 639.0 704.065955056 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.2370786517 138% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 23.0359550562 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.9817297603 60.3974514979 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 73.6071428571 118.986275619 62% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.2142857143 23.4991977007 65% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.25 5.21951772744 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 15.0 4.83258426966 310% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.272364994394 0.243740707755 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0793253983791 0.0831039109588 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0776776301611 0.0758088955206 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169307684565 0.150359130593 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0769968543897 0.0667264976115 115% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.0 14.1392134831 64% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 48.8420337079 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 12.1743820225 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.2 12.1639044944 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 100.480337079 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.8971910112 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.2143820225 71% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.