The best ideas arise from a passionate
interest in commonplace things.
Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree
with the statement above and explain your
reasoning for the position you take. In developing
and supporting your position, you should consider
ways in which the statement might or might not
hold true and explain how those considerations
shape your position.
I think that the best ideas arose from a passionate interest in commonplace things in earlier times, but in our current time period, I believe that the best ideas arise from a passionate interest in unique things or topics that go beyond just ordinary or day to day use. Therefore, I disagree with the statement.
Long ago and now, the main three commonplace things a person needs are food, shelter, and water. The cultivating of crops, building structures out of clay and wood, and the invention of wells or collecting rainwater are all examples of the best ideas of their day. They were extremely useful in surviving. However, the best ideas now in the 21st century come from unique inventions that an everyday person may not specifically need or think of, but it can come in handy for a large group of people. For example, we can think of the advancement of medicine or an expansion of a research project.
There are some serious diseases that a percentage of the population may get in their life, but not something every single person will get. The group of people who made that medicine to treat these people who are diagnosed with this certain disease were not passionate about ordinary things, but were probably passionate about specific topics like science and health. Others in society may have questioned them and thought they were crazy for trying to come up with this cure or treatment.
Another example of the best ideas arising from a passionate interest in something unique is a research project thought of by a graduate student and their professor. I work for two graduate students currently who are extremely passionate about bats (yes the flying mammals). Their interests to me are definitely not commonplace and some people would think they are nuts for working with bats. However, this is what they care about as well as other bat researchers. Some of these researchers are focusing on White-nose Syndrome which is a disease killing off many populations of bats. They would be stoked if they found a new idea to help bats combat this disease. Others may not consider this to be a huge win, but bats provide many ecosystem services and some species are essential for the things we have today.
Overall, I think that the first civilizations absolutely had the best ideas built upon commonplace things that were essential to everyday life. However, in our current time period, I think the best ideas arise from passions in unique or not as widely used things.
- The best ideas arise from a passionateinterest in commonplace things.Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagreewith the statement above and explain yourreasoning for the position you take. In developingand supporting your position, you should consi 54
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate. 50
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate. 50
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, so, therefore, well, for example, i think, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 58.6224719101 94% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2064.0 2235.4752809 92% => OK
No of words: 425.0 442.535393258 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85647058824 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54043259262 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57330883088 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 215.323595506 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.489411764706 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 657.0 704.065955056 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 7.0 1.77640449438 394% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.8899895775 60.3974514979 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.631578947 118.986275619 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3684210526 23.4991977007 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.36842105263 5.21951772744 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124995214981 0.243740707755 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0417140603338 0.0831039109588 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0365691793191 0.0758088955206 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0849271911237 0.150359130593 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0405993270515 0.0667264976115 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 14.1392134831 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.8420337079 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.1639044944 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 100.480337079 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.8971910112 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.