While encouraging feedback is a proper attitude of a leader, it does not necessarily warrant a leader to be the best.
A leader should be able to make decisions in critical conditions. Take a situation where the country has been attacked by a hostile force. In this situation the leader must be able to make a decision and make is fast. Time is a major factor in such a confrontation and reacting quickly can be vital for the future of the country. As such, asking the constituents about their opinion on how the country should respond is not a viable option. Therefore, a leader is the best if he/she can foresee the consequences of his decisions and be able to make the optimal decision that bears the least risk and maximum gain for his constituents.
Moreover, while asking for feedback is a major part of having a robust leadership, it is not enough. The people usually have a variety of opinions about issues. Simply asking for feedback would not resolve any confusion, yet is adds to it. A major role of a great leader is to be able to galvanize a culture of dialogue among his/her people. It is an art for a leader to be able to listen to different ideas and through set of suggestions and compromises, come of with a decision that keeps everyone happy.
And finally, it should be noted that encouraging feedback, while not enough, is a must in having a reliable leadership. No leader can understand the issues that his/her constituents face without getting feedback from them. A reliable channel of communication between a leader and the people whom he/she leads is a prerequisite for a strong leadership. But as the past two paragraphs have noted, it is not enough for making a leader the best. Knowing how to handle the feedbacks, how to respond to them, and when to ask for a feedback are all among the crucial traits that make a leader the best.
All in all, there are many factors that determine the quality of a leader. While encouraging feedback is one of them, it certainly is not all thats necessary. In addition, many other factor in a leader are needed for a robust leadership.
- Recent incursions by deep-sea fisherman into the habitat of the Madagascan shrimp have led to a significant reduction in the species population. With the breeding season fast approaching, the number of shrimp should soon begin to increase. Nonetheless, th 62
- "During the past year, workers at Butler Manufacturing reported 30 percent more on-the-job accidents than workers at nearby Panoply Industries, where the work shifts are one hour shorter than ours. A recent government study reports that fatigue and sleep 66
- When old buildings stand on ground that modern planners feel could be better used for modern purposes, modern development should be given precedence over the preservation of historic buildings.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you 79
- Claim: When planning courses, educators should take into account the interests and suggestions of their students.Reason: Students are more motivated to learn when they are interested in what they are studying.Write a response in which you discuss the exte 50
- Governments should not fund any scientific research whose consequences are unclear.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 143, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
...is one of them, it certainly is not all thats necessary. In addition, many other fact...
^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'finally', 'if', 'moreover', 'so', 'therefore', 'while', 'in addition']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.193236714976 0.240241500013 80% => OK
Verbs: 0.166666666667 0.157235817809 106% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0893719806763 0.0880659088768 101% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0410628019324 0.0497285424764 83% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0507246376812 0.0444667217837 114% => OK
Prepositions: 0.115942028986 0.12292977631 94% => OK
Participles: 0.0410628019324 0.0406280797675 101% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.75253839648 2.79330140395 99% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0338164251208 0.030933414821 109% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.142512077295 0.0997080785238 143% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0217391304348 0.0249443105267 87% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.024154589372 0.0148568991511 163% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2107.0 2732.02544248 77% => OK
No of words: 378.0 452.878318584 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.57407407407 6.0361032391 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40933352052 4.58838876751 96% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.333333333333 0.366273622748 91% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.227513227513 0.280924506359 81% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.145502645503 0.200843997647 72% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0925925925926 0.132149295362 70% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75253839648 2.79330140395 99% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 219.290929204 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.462962962963 0.48968727796 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 48.6448090648 55.4138127331 88% => OK
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6194690265 97% => OK
Sentence length: 18.9 23.380412469 81% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.962626518 59.4972553346 57% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.35 141.124799967 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9 23.380412469 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.4 0.674092028746 59% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.21349557522 19% => OK
Readability: 41.6513227513 51.4728631049 81% => OK
Elegance: 1.35514018692 1.64882698954 82% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212760033889 0.391690518653 54% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.104295861023 0.123202303941 85% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0712243766427 0.077325440228 92% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.539451942914 0.547984918172 98% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.160066324788 0.149214159877 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0912150731665 0.161403998019 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0627356097342 0.0892212321368 70% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.343569493543 0.385218514788 89% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0540706616012 0.0692045440612 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145960696287 0.275328986314 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0712575084247 0.0653680567796 109% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.4325221239 105% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.30420353982 94% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88274336283 82% => OK
Positive topic words: 9.0 7.22455752212 125% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 3.66592920354 109% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 2.70907079646 148% => OK
Total topic words: 17.0 13.5995575221 125% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.