The best leaders are those who encourage feedback from the people whom they lead.
I believe that great leaders are those who dynamically shift their perspectives based on their followers' feedback. Leaders who constantly strive to meet their followers expectations are the ones that emerge at the top.
This is evident, considering Silicon Valley's top five companies. Google for instance, has a robust methodology of obtaining feedback from their employees. Workers are given anonymity when filling forms or surveys in the hope that it will motivate them to describe their true feelings about the company without fear of the repercussions of doing so. In sharp contrast, a leader who is not concerned about the thoughts of their followers is bound to fail. Hitler, a charismatic leader, through his persuasive speeches lead the German people to believe that the Jewish population was the root of all problems in Germany. Although an effective persuader, not once did Hitler solicit the people's thoughts on his hypothesis. The harrowing events that ensued in Germany and Hitler's eventual downfall can all be attributed to his dictatorial style of leadership.
A leader who encourages feedback must be wary of the people's mindset. They must know the level of education of the people and must know when and when not to listen to them. Consider for example, the issue of people against vaccination in many developed nations today. Although the reason they cite might seem legitimate, it is in their best interest to vaccinate their children. The leader of the nation in this case must realize that the people opposing vaccination do not know any better and often come from uneducated and underprivileged sections of the society.
Feedback, most often proves to be beneficial, in the sense that it may reveal certain things that would not have occured to the leader. It is well known that the knowledge of the crowd is superior and encouraging feedback may be one way of harnessing this knowledge. It is no surprise that China, while rapidly improving its economy and infrastructure has consistently dropped in its happiness index. The leadership is to be imputed for this. China's so-called democratic system consists of only one party that has ultimate power in what the country does. Feedback and any forms of art or media to provide feedback are quickly banned, in order to prevent people from expressing their opinions.
To be an effective leader, one must strive to work for their people and must periodically elicit a response from the people whom they lead. The leader is after all, the representative of the people and a leader who does not reflect the people's thoughts in their actions is destined to fail.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-08 | sn140 | 62 | view |
| 2019-12-15 | bstergios55@yahoo.com | 83 | view |
| 2019-12-03 | zzk81 | 66 | view |
| 2019-12-02 | Aishwarya Jadhav | 33 | view |
| 2019-11-19 | ryuha | 66 | view |
- Educators should take students' interests into account when planning the content of the courses they teach.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the posi 66
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the pos 83
- The best leaders are those who encourage feedback from the people whom they lead. 75
- The following appeared in a memo from a budget planner for the city of Grandview."It is time for the city of Grandview to stop funding the Grandview Symphony Orchestra. It is true that the symphony struggled financially for many years, but last year 79
- a 16
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 54, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
...encourages feedback must be wary of the peoples mindset. They must know the level of ed...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, so, well, while, after all, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.3162921348 177% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 33.0505617978 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 59.0 58.6224719101 101% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2214.0 2235.4752809 99% => OK
No of words: 434.0 442.535393258 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10138248848 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56428161445 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7637708583 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 215.323595506 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539170506912 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 677.7 704.065955056 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.2054513954 60.3974514979 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 100.636363636 118.986275619 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7272727273 23.4991977007 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.04545454545 5.21951772744 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.376926237801 0.243740707755 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0983601009995 0.0831039109588 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0913012102431 0.0758088955206 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208523302309 0.150359130593 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0785592159947 0.0667264976115 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 100.480337079 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.