The best test of an argument is the argument's ability to convince someone with an opposing viewpoint.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for

The statement that the best test of an argument is its ability to compelling someone with an opposing viewpoint is true to some extent but there are certain other factors that come into play while determining the effectiveness of the argument altogether.

The primary goal of any argument is definitely to compel the supporters of opposing viewpoint but in doing so one must not forget the true essence of this activity. Arguments are considered as a source of information exchange and ways of instilling a sense of empathy between contending sides. Educational Institutes through their debating societies and clubs engage young minds into healthy argument to develop a sense of counter-arguments and also to develop a mutual respect towards each other's values. If the participant only focus on compelling listeners to their sides, then they would lose the very objective of this healthy activity.

There are lots of things that makes an argument great besides the ability of compulsion such as the intellect of its participants. There have been lots of arguments in history where none of the participants in succeeded in convincing one another. But they all got to enjoy the brilliance and wisdom of each other and learned to appreciate each other's viewpoint.

Some arguments are controversial enough as they target religion, culture and traditions of different sects of the society. In such cases, both sides stick to their respective sides but there is a swift flow of information regarding culture, religion and traditions of one another.

In my view arguments are basically tasked with goals of compelling components or gathering large supporters but the best test of argument is its ability to allow information exchange, spread harmony and a mutual respect and understanding of each other's boundaries.

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 165, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Arguments
...orget the true essence of this activity.Arguments are regarded as source of information e...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 225, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed as source of information exchange and ways of instilling a sense of empathy b...
^^
Line 3, column 245, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rmation exchange and ways of instilling a sense of empathy between its participa...
^^
Line 3, column 505, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ual respect towards each others values. If the participant only focus on compellin...
^^
Line 3, column 590, Rule ID: LOOSE_LOSE[4]
Message: Did you mean 'lose' (= miss, waste, suffer the loss etc.)?
Suggestion: lose
...isteners to their sides then they would loose the very objective of this healthy acti...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 345, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'others'' or 'other's'?
Suggestion: others'; other's
...ch other and learned to appreciate each others viewpoint. Some arguments are contro...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, if, regarding, so, still, then, while, such as, in my view

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 12.4196629213 16% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 33.0505617978 48% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 58.6224719101 82% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1528.0 2235.4752809 68% => OK
No of words: 288.0 442.535393258 65% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30555555556 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.55969084622 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07318148576 2.79657885939 110% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 215.323595506 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.538194444444 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 704.065955056 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 6.24550561798 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 20.2370786517 49% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 23.0359550562 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 65.2576432305 60.3974514979 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 152.8 118.986275619 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.8 23.4991977007 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.8 5.21951772744 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22735796936 0.243740707755 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0908111261008 0.0831039109588 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100058397923 0.0758088955206 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146346478626 0.150359130593 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.112780736533 0.0667264976115 169% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 14.1392134831 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 48.8420337079 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 12.1743820225 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.11 12.1639044944 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 100.480337079 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 11.8971910112 168% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 11.2143820225 118% => OK
text_standard: 20.0 11.7820224719 170% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.