The best test of an argument is the argument's ability to convince someone with an opposing viewpoint.
When there is argument on any of the topic between two persons or any two groups than the result of that argument ultimately determines that how much the one person was able to powerfully convince the other person with opposing viewpoint.
If there is any debate on any of the topic then the both the parties should try to convince another party with conflicting viewpoint because any argument is justifiable or not only depends on how powerfully one party can convince another with its viewpoint. The party should keep the points in the argument such that it leads to conclusion and which incline the opposing party more towards its side in accepting its viewpoint. The party instead of getting indulge in the heated argument with the party with opposing viewpoint it should always try to influence opposing party such that the opposing party on it's own accept the ideas. If any child enters into an argument with his parents upon eating chocolates then he should try to convince his parents that he will not eat chocolates everyday but only on some days. So in that way he would be able to convince his parents upon eating chocolates or else he will enter into an heated argument with them and he would not be able to achieve success in his argument.
Sometimes there are possibilities that the person with unjustified view point may be able to convince the another person with justified opposing viewpoint so in that case the above statement may prove to be wrong. For example sometimes in court hearing the person who is not guilty is not able to keep his strong point in the court during the argument in the court with another opposing viewpoint advocate so in that case the person who is justified may loose the case. There are also many other cases like in case of politics also a political person is always needed to keep his strong point in front of the public and a strong point in argument with opposing party or else a person would not be able to win the elections. Also there is a sometimes need in the bussiness market to starve one must keep its strong point in argument lead by its rivalries.
Hence, in sum the person should always keep his tone calm and keep the strong points in front of the person with opposing viewpoint. So with this the person can easily win the argument against the person with opposing viewpoint and can convince the person for accepting viewpoint.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-16 | jason123 | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | Abhipray Singh | 58 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | Abhipray Singh | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-04 | ali.rs | 54 | view |
| 2019-12-12 | Pranjil | 66 | view |
- Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student's field of study. 54
- We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from people whose views contradict our own. 50
- An ailing patient should have easy access to his or her doctor’s record of treating similarly afflicted patients. Through gaining such access, the ailing patient may better determine whether the doctor is competent to treat that medical condition 58
- The following appeared in an e-mail sent by the marketing director of the Classical Shakespeare Theatre of Bardville."Over the past ten years, there has been a 20 percent decline in the size of the average audience at Classical Shakespeare Theatre product 66
- "Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field." 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 568, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... should always try to influence opposing party such that the opposing party on it...
^^
Line 2, column 786, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...parents that he will not eat chocolates everyday but only on some days. So in that way h...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 924, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...g chocolates or else he will enter into an heated argument with them and he would ...
^^
Line 3, column 82, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e person with unjustified view point may be able to convince the another person w...
^^
Line 3, column 455, Rule ID: LOOSE_LOSE[4]
Message: Did you mean 'lose' (= miss, waste, suffer the loss etc.)?
Suggestion: lose
...at case the person who is justified may loose the case. There are also many other cas...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 635, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n front of the public and a strong point in argument with opposing party or else...
^^
Line 3, column 639, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ont of the public and a strong point in argument with opposing party or else a p...
^^
Line 3, column 727, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...would not be able to win the elections. Also there is a sometimes need in the bussin...
^^^^
Line 3, column 741, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('sometimes') instead an adjective, or a noun ('need') instead of another adjective.
...ble to win the elections. Also there is a sometimes need in the bussiness market to starve one m...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, may, so, then, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 58.6224719101 109% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1971.0 2235.4752809 88% => OK
No of words: 423.0 442.535393258 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.65957446809 5.05705443957 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53508145475 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36743495203 2.79657885939 85% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 215.323595506 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.354609929078 0.4932671777 72% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 623.7 704.065955056 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 6.24550561798 0% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.740449438202 135% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.2370786517 59% => Need more sentences, or put a space between two sentences.
Sentence length: 35.0 23.0359550562 152% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.2885808516 60.3974514979 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 164.25 118.986275619 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 35.25 23.4991977007 150% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.21951772744 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 7.80617977528 115% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.294743457035 0.243740707755 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138388715114 0.0831039109588 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0471159294042 0.0758088955206 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199466468016 0.150359130593 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0472581751825 0.0667264976115 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 14.1392134831 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.41 48.8420337079 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 12.1743820225 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.34 12.1639044944 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.13 8.38706741573 85% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 100.480337079 47% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 11.8971910112 155% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.0 11.2143820225 143% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.7820224719 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.