The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government industry or other fields is by instilling in them sense of cooperation not competition

Essay topics:

The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry or other fields is by instilling in them sense of cooperation, not competition.

The speaker contends that the optimum way to prepare the young generation for leadership in various fields is to make them understand the value of cooperation instead of competition. I concede that cooperation in young people can create synergy in their learning progress and they can also learn from each other. In some respect, however, competition is essential to find out who is going to lead the group.
Admittedly, working in a group makes it easier for young generation to create synergy in their work. It gives them idea about what they excel at and therefore, work towards it. Cooperation in young teaches them that working in a team yields more output than working as an individual. To illustrate, we have seen many donation campaigns done by the youth. They are extremely enthusiastic towards the work through cooperation. Together, they are able to reach any extremes because they know they have each other in their backup. Thus, working together in a group makes youth more energetic and self-reliant towards their task which is an essential skill required by the youth for leadership.
Moreover, cooperation is the best way to learn from each other and to be a leader, it is essential to respect everyone's knowledge. When students work in a group they have a sense of sharing knowledge with each other which makes them confident in themselves and well as know about others making them aware about wide range of perspective. For instance, in a science class, a project is assigned to a group member who posses divergent interest within science. Say, one has interest in physics, another has interest in botany , another in zoology and so on. When they work in a group the young one who is proficient in physics can share his knowledge and so can other youth in their expertise. This sense of sharing knowledge boosts their confidence as well and make them a efficient leader.
However, the speaker ignores that the sense of competition in youth makes them better in their work and therefore be a better leader. Since there is only one who can handle everyone in a group, the sense of competition is essential to find out who that person is in a group.
In sum, the statement correctly states that the cooperation is essential for youth as it can help in building confidence to work in team and therefore synergy in their work. However, the statement overlooks students the sense of competition in youth can make them better in leadership because there is only one leader to help in cooperation. Therefore, both cooperation and competition in youth is essential for leadership quality development.

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2021-11-05 saanri54321 50 view
2021-11-05 saanri54321 16 view
2021-01-31 karanthatai 50 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user saanri54321 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 522, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... physics, another has interest in botany , another in zoology and so on. When they...
^^
Line 3, column 769, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... their confidence as well and make them a efficient leader. However, the speaker...
^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, look, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, for instance

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 33.0505617978 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 69.0 58.6224719101 118% => OK
Nominalization: 25.0 12.9106741573 194% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2172.0 2235.4752809 97% => OK
No of words: 441.0 442.535393258 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92517006803 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58257569496 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74530148584 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 215.323595506 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.421768707483 0.4932671777 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 671.4 704.065955056 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.175138597 60.3974514979 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.428571429 118.986275619 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 23.4991977007 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.33333333333 5.21951772744 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 10.2758426966 165% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25452282883 0.243740707755 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.084551541686 0.0831039109588 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0696439138831 0.0758088955206 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166228963508 0.150359130593 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0656815049944 0.0667264976115 98% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 14.1392134831 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.8420337079 120% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.51 8.38706741573 90% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 100.480337079 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.