The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition.
Young people are the pillars of a society. It is the young people who envision and create a better tomorrow. So it becomes very important upon what values and virtues their personalities are cultivated. In that sense, one could not agree more of the given arguement.
The role of a leader in any sector is not limited by decision making and authorizing and it goes far beyond that which is collaborating with the people and colleagues whom he or she is ought ot lead. Those traits demand more of a harmonious and affable person rather than a competitive one. True that, vie spirit can motivate the team to work faster and becoming preemptive but it can never bolster the team nature and the notion of togetherness which is essential for the survival of any organisation. Such establishment can survive battles but will loose the war.
As a leader of an establishment, one is prone to face many askance and diatribes which requires a placid response than a belligerant one. Growing the tendency of collaboration in the minds of young people will make them more broad minded and inundable to criticisms rendering them highly tolerant. Such attitude will strive for success of the team as a whole imparting much more confidence and perseverenace in the task the team wishes to complete. If not, the leader may become chary of himself and pushes others to frenzy disseminating triades and precipitation leading to untoward results.
On the other hand, competitiveness is necessary in the minimal way, the absence of which may turn the team lethargic and apathetic. But instilling too much of competitiveness in the minds of the young people may convert them into individualistic extremists prioritizing only the welfare of their own growth and well being in critical times abandoning the team. The consequence may be as serious as that the nation may witness the younger generation being more selfish and self oriented eliminating the sense of altruism and service.
There is a saying 'Great men are not born; they are grown'. Thus the qualities which the society nurtures in the young minds is the future that it preordains. In order to have a better and congruous world, its cooperation and harmony that must be propagated not competitiveness.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-31 | ekarumeblessing@icloud.com | 79 | view |
| 2024-08-31 | hainess25 | 70 | view |
| 2024-08-28 | Rishab@1999 | 50 | view |
| 2024-07-02 | MMoksha | 66 | view |
| 2024-06-30 | AkellaSrinivas | 66 | view |
- It is primarily through our identification with social groups that we define ourselves 75
- In their advertising businesses nowadays usually emphasise that their products are new in some way Why is this Do you think is is a positive or negative development 78
- Major policy decisions should always be left to politicians and other government experts 66
- The graph below shows the number of books read by men and women at Burnaby Public Library from 2011 to 2014 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Colleges and universities should require their students to spend at least on semester studying in foreign land 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 552, Rule ID: LOOSE_LOSE[4]
Message: Did you mean 'lose' (= miss, waste, suffer the loss etc.)?
Suggestion: lose
...ablishment can survive battles but will loose the war. As a leader of an establish...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 89, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...in the minimal way, the absence of which may turn the team lethargic and apatheti...
^^
Line 9, column 59, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...Great men are not born; they are grown. Thus the qualities which the society nurture...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, so, still, thus, well, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 14.8657303371 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 58.6224719101 65% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1876.0 2235.4752809 84% => OK
No of words: 376.0 442.535393258 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98936170213 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40348946061 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96295216956 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 215.323595506 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571808510638 0.4932671777 116% => OK
syllable_count: 592.2 704.065955056 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.6613875048 60.3974514979 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.222222222 118.986275619 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8888888889 23.4991977007 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.21951772744 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18443732295 0.243740707755 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0506303495784 0.0831039109588 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0441901760824 0.0758088955206 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0917766359966 0.150359130593 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0242755352906 0.0667264976115 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.1639044944 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 100.480337079 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.